Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

contributing KEPs in SIG Node: best practices #8005

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 8, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: SergeyKanzhelev

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 8, 2024
@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @mrunalp

sig-node/CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-node/CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-node/CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-node/CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-node/CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-node/CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-node/CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-node/CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-node/CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sig-node/CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mrunalp
Copy link
Contributor

mrunalp commented Aug 15, 2024

I left nits but this looks great overall. Thanks!

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member Author

I left nits but this looks great overall. Thanks!

cool, applied suggestions.

I plan to write about code contributions processes after this one is merged

Comment on lines +7 to +8
The diversity of workloads, environments, and the scale SIG Node needs to support makes every code change risky as all the side effects need to be evaluated.
And the contribution can realistically only be evaluated by a small set of maintainers.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not a huge fan of this clause and sentence

as all the side effects need to be evaluated.
And the contribution can realistically only be evaluated by a small set of maintainers.

I think the broader point you're trying to make is the bar is very high for a contributor and maintainers have low bandwidth to fully work through all the possible reprocussions of a contribution. I think that's true and it can be spelled out, but I think it's tricky to word it without fully discouraging contributions you know?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

plus the first clause

The diversity of workloads, environments, and the scale SIG Node needs to support makes every code change risky

captures that intent


Read the [Kubernetes Contributor Guide](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/contributors/guide#contributor-guide).

If you aspire to grow scope in the SIG, please review the [SIG Node contributor ladder](./sig-node-contributor-ladder.md) for SIG specific guidance.

### For Enhancements

SIG Node enhancements are available in the <https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-node>.
Find out if [your thing is an enhancement a.k.a KEP](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/?tab=readme-ov-file#is-my-thing-an-enhancement).
A good way to do that is to open and issue and get feedback from node reviewers and approvers. You can even come present your idea at a weekly sig-node meeting.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SIG Node* ?

A good way to do that is to open and issue and get feedback from node reviewers and approvers. You can even come present your idea at a weekly sig-node meeting.

If you plan to contribute an enhancement, please prepare yourself for at least 1 year of engagement.
A KEP takes at least 3 kubernetes releases to move from alpha to beta to GA. If there are API / kubelet skew considerations, it may take even longer.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is now 4, as beta is commonly 2 stages now


If you plan to contribute an enhancement, please prepare yourself for at least 1 year of engagement.
A KEP takes at least 3 kubernetes releases to move from alpha to beta to GA. If there are API / kubelet skew considerations, it may take even longer.
SIG Node expects contributors to commit to land a KEP to GA stage to avoid [permanent betas](https://kubernetes.io/blog/2020/08/21/moving-forward-from-beta/#avoiding-permanent-beta).

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

WDYT of

SIG Node expects that contributors commit to taking a KEP to GA stage to avoid

If you plan to contribute an enhancement, please prepare yourself for at least 1 year of engagement.
A KEP takes at least 3 kubernetes releases to move from alpha to beta to GA. If there are API / kubelet skew considerations, it may take even longer.
SIG Node expects contributors to commit to land a KEP to GA stage to avoid [permanent betas](https://kubernetes.io/blog/2020/08/21/moving-forward-from-beta/#avoiding-permanent-beta).
It is always surprising how much work is needed to productize the feature after it seems complete.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what do you mean by productize here?

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 17, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants