Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QEMU RockyLinux 9 and Ubuntu 23.04 #1332

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2023

Conversation

feitnomore
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds RockyLinux 9 as well as Ubuntu 23.04 LTS support for QEMU.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged): Fixes #

Additional context
This PR adds support for Rocky Linux 9.2 and Ubuntu 23.04 LTS for QEMU CAPI.
@AverageMarcus F.Y.I.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Oct 25, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @feitnomore. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 25, 2023
@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 25, 2023
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
{
"boot_command_prefix": "c<wait>linux /casper/vmlinuz --- autoinstall ds='nocloud-net;s=http://{{ .HTTPIP }}:{{ .HTTPPort }}/22.04/'<enter><wait>initrd /casper/initrd<enter><wait>boot<enter>",
"boot_command_prefix": "c<wait>linux /casper/vmlinuz --- autoinstall ds='nocloud-net;s=http://{{ .HTTPIP }}:{{ .HTTPPort }}/22.04/'<enter><wait>initrd /casper/initrd<enter><wait><wait><wait>boot<enter>",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this related to this PR?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, while testing, depending on the performance, I've got issues. If you are using a slower system, you may need to wait a bit more. In my case, I needed to add this, as well as increase some timeouts on ansible.cfg so that I could have success. The ansible.cfg changes I have not commited.

Comment on lines +7 to +9
"iso_checksum": "c7cda48494a6d7d9665964388a3fc9c824b3bef0c9ea3818a1be982bc80d346b",
"iso_checksum_type": "sha256",
"iso_url": "https://releases.ubuntu.com/23.04/ubuntu-23.04-live-server-amd64.iso",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this ISO change with new updates to 23.04? If so the checksum will eventually not match, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately, I don't see a specific file for 23.04.1 or .2 as we have for 22. The only file I see is this one.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😞 This is starting to become a recurring issue for us.

@mboersma did we ever come up with any way of handling this when there isn't an old.ubuntu.com link available?

I find it so weird that Ubuntu doesn't produce static images for their current releases.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://releases.ubuntu.com/23.04/SHA256SUMS might be a way. A possible solution could be to load the values from that file dynamically.

curl -sS https://releases.ubuntu.com/23.04/SHA256SUMS | grep "ubuntu-23.04-live-server-amd64.iso" | awk '{print $1}'

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm more concerned about reproducible builds. If the ubuntu iso is updated with a breaking change it could break for image-builder users without there being any changes / releases to image-builder.

We currently doing have a way around this I don't think, it's just really annoying. 😞

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Issue: #1334

Copy link
Member

@AverageMarcus AverageMarcus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Just a few small comments / questions.

Aside from that, could you please squash your commits before we merge? 😄

@AverageMarcus
Copy link
Member

I'm not going to block based on the iso issue as we have that elsewhere already. I'll open an issue to address the problem more generally.

/lgtm

@feitnomore before approval could you please squash the commits? :)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 27, 2023
Set CPU Model to Host
Add QEMU Support for Ubuntu 23.04 LTS
Add QEMU Support for RockyLinux 9

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Feitoza Parisi <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 27, 2023
@AverageMarcus
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 27, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AverageMarcus

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 27, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c9a3840 into kubernetes-sigs:main Oct 27, 2023
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants