Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add flag to allow re-using of existing namespace #211

Open
AverageMarcus opened this issue Aug 16, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #212
Open

Add flag to allow re-using of existing namespace #211

AverageMarcus opened this issue Aug 16, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #212
Assignees

Comments

@AverageMarcus
Copy link
Member

AverageMarcus commented Aug 16, 2024

Currently it's not possible to use an existing namespace for hydrophone as it prompts you to run a cleanup if the provided namespace already exists.

It would be nice to have a flag similar to Sonobuoys --skip-preflight=existingnamespace that can instruct Hydrophone to use an existing namespace.

The reason for this is we generally run clusters with strict network policies enforced by default that prevents cross-namespace communication. To still allow the conformance tests to run and be triggered we need to create a CiliumNetworkPolicy within the conformance namespace but cannot do that before running hydrophone currently.

@aniruddha2000 aniruddha2000 self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
@aniruddha2000 aniruddha2000 linked a pull request Aug 16, 2024 that will close this issue
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 14, 2024
@AverageMarcus
Copy link
Member Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants