-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 428
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix typos #4136
fix typos #4136
Conversation
/cherry-pick release-1.10 |
@nawazkh: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.10 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
209fb5f
to
a10ab08
Compare
/cherry-pick release-1.11 |
@nawazkh: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.11 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov ReportAll modified lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4136 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 57.82% 57.83% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 187 187
Lines 19190 19195 +5
==========================================
+ Hits 11096 11101 +5
Misses 7466 7466
Partials 628 628
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
.github/workflows/codespell.yml
Outdated
egress-policy: audit | ||
|
||
- uses: actions/checkout@c85c95e3d7251135ab7dc9ce3241c5835cc595a9 # v3.5.3 | ||
- uses: codespell-project/actions-codespell@94259cd8be02ad2903ba34a22d9c13de21a74461 # master |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the latest codespell finds the typos that this PR fixes?
We also run codespell
in the make verify
target, so we'd be running it twice in CI. That's not terrible, unless the versions or configurations of the two codespell
s diverge. Then a contributor might have a PR rejected for something they can't reproduce locally.
(See also #4029, somewhat related.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the latest codespell finds the typos that this PR fixes?
It looks like the latest codespell, v2.2.6
does find the typos this PR aims to fix.
We also run codespell in the make verify target, so we'd run it twice in CI.
You are right. It is better if I update the codespell version in the Makefile instead of adding the codespell.yml
github action.
a10ab08
to
26eb912
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 22993e660cc3a21c08744290e255999f132c0b5f
|
/approve |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-containerd-upstream-with-ci-artifacts |
You should only use this feature if your cluster infrastructure lifecycle management has constraints that the reference implementation does not support. See [user stories](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/blob/10d89ceca938e4d3d94a1d1c2b60515bcdf39829/docs/proposals/20210203-externally-managed-cluster-infrastructure.md#user-stories) for more details. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Strange that there is a diff in this line. Rechecking and fixing any errors I see.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copied over the earlier file and updated the spelling I was concerned about.
I don't see a reason for this line to show up as a diff.
Leaving it as is now, sorry for the force push leading to the removal of "lgtm".
Please take a look again.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks related to whitespace.
26eb912
to
89222bc
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 17a26817c94eec12fbf6a07f4bc747ffdd16a5da
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: nojnhuh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/override pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-containerd-upstream-with-ci-artifacts |
@mboersma: Overrode contexts on behalf of mboersma: pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-windows-containerd-upstream-with-ci-artifacts In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/override pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-aks Mea culpa, but I'm fairly sure these typo fixes are not affecting that test. |
@mboersma: Overrode contexts on behalf of mboersma: pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-aks In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@nawazkh: #4136 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.10":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@nawazkh: new pull request created: #4142 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
make verify
locally.Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
TODOs:
Release note: