Macros: Rebuild with a completely different architecture #1094
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the work in progress pull request aiming to implement the architecture envisioned in #1093.
At the moment, it doesn't accomplish it yet, but goes a long way by reworking
Macros.play()
to be reusable byDynamicMacros
. We do this in a similar way we allowEEPROM-Keymap
to override keys, viaLayer.getKey()
: we makeMacros.readMacroByte()
a function that other plugins can override. As such,Macros.play()
will read byte by byte from wherever we fancy, and play the macro. This lets us remove a large part of the duplication currently inDynamicMacros
.We're not where #1093 wants to go yet, though. We need the
onMacroStep()
event, which will require further changes. And there remains the problem ofDynamicMacros.updateDynamicMacroCache()
which has to parse macros, but not play them. Those will be addressed in future updates to this draft PR.