-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added Sonarqube JUnit XML format #26
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Added new flag for old junit xml format
Changed JUnit xml preparation. Added new flag(sonarFormatFlg) to control xml preparation.if flag not mentioned or set as flase it will produce junit xsd.if it is set as true then it will format xml in sonar format way.
Hi @eventualbuddha , |
This change is very useful for sonarqube user.so please merge this changes.it will not effect the existing flow. Thanks, |
@vignesh1001 I have no write access to this repository and am not a maintainer of it. You'd be better off asking @vojtajina. |
Hi @vojtajina , |
Any updates on this? |
This needs rebasing onto latest master and cleanup to make CI pass first. |
Yep :) Is anyone going to do this soon? @vignesh1001 maybe? |
Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign. Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g.
|
Hi,
We made some changes in index.js, sonarqube will not display all failures so we made some changes in xml preparation without effecting existing one.
Changed junit xml format preparation to the following way,
< testcase >
< error / >
< /testcase >
< testcase >
< failure />
< /testcase >
instead of
< testcase >
< failure />
< failure />
< error />
< /testcase >
Kindly update this changes, it may useful for sonarqube users.