Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update sphinx-immaterial to 0.12.1 #134

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR updates sphinx-immaterial from 0.12.0 to 0.12.1.

Changelog

0.12.1

What's Changed
* json: Fix bug with specifying maxItems but not minItems by jbms in https://github.com/jbms/sphinx-immaterial/pull/371
* apidoc/python: Fix xrefs to type parameters by jbms in https://github.com/jbms/sphinx-immaterial/pull/372


**Full Changelog**: https://github.com/jbms/sphinx-immaterial/compare/v0.12.0...v0.12.1
Links

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.42%. Comparing base (4944872) to head (f989c24).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #134   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.42%   96.42%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         196      196           
=======================================
  Hits          189      189           
  Misses          7        7           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jsfehler jsfehler merged commit 79741fd into master Jul 23, 2024
6 checks passed
@jsfehler jsfehler deleted the pyup-update-sphinx-immaterial-0.12.0-to-0.12.1 branch July 23, 2024 22:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants