-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DBManager: getAll now accepts DBFilter<T>... #290
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice PR @jrfinc, do we need this overload? And the corresponding null check in the other
getAll
?Without this overload a call to
getAll(offset, limit, orders)
will just invoke the other with an empty array.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right and we don't need it, but if removed it could break other DBManager implementations (in jPOS-EE RevisionManager for example, but could have overrides in other projects). It's an easy fix on the managers but still I thought it didn't hurt leaving it.
Regarding the null check, we need it for: Arrays.stream(filters) (I can either check for null like I did, or use Optionals. etc).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand, I see there are two null checks, one for protecting against the nullity of the filters argument, and one for each element on it. I wonder if that is because of this call or for protection against other calls.
I was thinking that this call could be with an empty array, in case the inner null check is because of this
null
, but one can't be too cautious anyway right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I am thinking mainly on use cases of optional filters for a big list. It could happen that nulls get there.
I guess the devs using this call could (should?) sanitize the array and remove nulls beforehand, but it was easy to do here too.