EUI-8918: Case Flags fix and EUI-8968: Case Flags v2.1 fixes #1612
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* initial fix for document upload problems * Candidate fix for EXUI-908 * Update the other version number * changed read me --------- Co-authored-by: RiteshHMCTS <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ritesh Dsouza <[email protected]>
Daniel-Lam
force-pushed
the
chore/re-tag-for-case-file-view-1.1
branch
from
ff3c611 to
69fc0d3
Compare
Re-tag for re-release following deployment of Case File View 1.1 to live.
Daniel-Lam
force-pushed
the
chore/re-tag-for-case-file-view-1.1
branch
from
69fc0d3 to
874ae6b
Compare
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
udaydenduluri33
approved these changes
Nov 13, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
JIRA link (if applicable)
EUI-8918
EUI-8968
Change description
Re-tag for re-release following deployment of Case File View 1.1 to live.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")