Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update PKI tests to leverage the tidy-status test helper #28531

Merged

Conversation

stevendpclark
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • I have a suspicion the for loop with the timer can be infinite loops in certain circumstances. Instead leverage the normal test helpers for fetching tidy status

I've checked and no ENT specific tests call this function, so the API change is safe.

TODO only if you're a HashiCorp employee

  • Backport Labels: If this PR is in the ENT repo and needs to be backported, backport
    to N, N-1, and N-2, using the backport/ent/x.x.x+ent labels. If this PR is in the CE repo, you should only backport to N, using the backport/x.x.x label, not the enterprise labels.
    • If this fixes a critical security vulnerability or severity 1 bug, it will also need to be backported to the current LTS versions of Vault. To ensure this, use all available enterprise labels.
  • ENT Breakage: If this PR either 1) removes a public function OR 2) changes the signature
    of a public function, even if that change is in a CE file, double check that
    applying the patch for this PR to the ENT repo and running tests doesn't
    break any tests. Sometimes ENT only tests rely on public functions in CE
    files.
  • Jira: If this change has an associated Jira, it's referenced either
    in the PR description, commit message, or branch name.
  • RFC: If this change has an associated RFC, please link it in the description.
  • ENT PR: If this change has an associated ENT PR, please link it in the
    description. Also, make sure the changelog is in this PR, not in your ENT PR.

@stevendpclark stevendpclark self-assigned this Sep 27, 2024
@stevendpclark stevendpclark requested a review from a team as a code owner September 27, 2024 20:31
@github-actions github-actions bot added the hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) contributed label Sep 27, 2024
require.NoError(t, err, "failed registering account")
t.Logf("got account URI: %v", acct.URI)
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stevendpclark stevendpclark Sep 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Swapped to avoid a nil panic if erris set and not acct.

Copy link

CI Results:
All Go tests succeeded! ✅

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Build Results:
All builds succeeded! ✅

@stevendpclark stevendpclark requested a review from a team as a code owner October 1, 2024 13:37
 - I have a suspicion the for loop with the timer can be infinite loops
   in certain circumstances. Instead leverage the normal test helpers
   for fetching tidy status
@stevendpclark stevendpclark force-pushed the stevendpclark/vault-31290-use-common-helpers-for-tidy branch from 85f257f to e2f41f4 Compare October 1, 2024 16:05
@stevendpclark stevendpclark removed the request for review from a team October 1, 2024 16:24
Copy link
Contributor

@victorr victorr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/ent/1.16.x+ent Changes are backported to 1.16.x+ent backport/1.18.x hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) contributed pr/no-changelog pr/no-milestone test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants