You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #1158 (comment), it was pointed out that simply checking if the field in question is plural or not is not a robust check when the field represents a resource. However, AIP-158 isn't exclusively for resources, so perhaps it shouldn't only focus on them. So while we can handle the case where the field represents a resource and check its plural, maybe it shouldn't be limited to that. Not sure though, we want to chat about it some more.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In #1158 (comment), it was pointed out that simply checking if the field in question is plural or not is not a robust check when the field represents a resource. However, AIP-158 isn't exclusively for resources, so perhaps it shouldn't only focus on them. So while we can handle the case where the field represents a resource and check its
plural
, maybe it shouldn't be limited to that. Not sure though, we want to chat about it some more.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: