-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 985
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Section nested under page must respect its slug in the URL path #2369
Open
asimpletune
wants to merge
36
commits into
getzola:next
Choose a base branch
from
asimpletune:next_issue-2368
base: next
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Reuse Client when checking urls and add timeout for requests
* Implement replace_re filter * Cargo fmt * add regex caching * cargo fmt * update docs, update unit test * rename replace_re -> regex_replace
Relative links in the entry content do not currently have a base URI, so will be resolved relative to the feed URI: Given an entry with the content: <a href="some-resource.bin"> And URIS of: * entry: https://example.org/blog/some-entry/ * feed: https://example.org/atom.xml The link URI will end up as: https://example.org/some-resource.bin rather than the URI that ends up resolved in the rendered page: https://example.org/blog/some-entry/some-resource.bin The atom and RSS formats allow for an xml:base attribute (itself specified in [1]) to provide a base URI of a subset of a document. This change adds xml:base attributes to each entry, using the page permalink. This gives us something equivalent to: <entry> <content xml:base="https://example.org/blog/some-entry/"> <![CDATA[ <a href="some-resource.bin"> ]]> </content> </entry> [1]: https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/ Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <[email protected]>
* Fix multi-ligual json index * multi-lingual search Fix cargo fmt
…tzola#2196) * Add search into the serialized config (getzola#2165) * Only expose index_format * Create config.search struct * cargo fmt
* Fix hard link panic and add better error info to std:fs errors * cargo fmt * Remove erroneously committed config change * Remove console import; Use with context to provide additional error info * improve error wording
* Add optional decoding="async" loading="lazy" for img In theory, they can make the page load faster and show content faster. There’s one problem: CommonMark allows arbitrary inline elements in alt text. If I want to get the correct alt text, I need to match every inline event. I think most people will only use plain text, so I only match Event::Text. * Add very basic test for img This is the reason why we should use plain text when lazy_async_image is enabled. * Explain lazy_async_image in documentation * Add test with empty alt and special characters I totaly forgot one can leave the alt text empty. I thought I need to eliminate the alt attribute in that case, but actually empty alt text is better than not having an alt attribute at all: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H67.html https://www.boia.org/blog/images-that-dont-need-alternative-text-still-need-alt-attributes Thus I will leave the empty alt text. Another test is added to ensure alt text is properly escaped. I will remove the redundant escaping code after this commit. * Remove manually escaping alt text After removing the if-else inside the arm of Event::Text(text), the alt text is still escaped. Indeed they are redundant. * Use insta for snapshot testing `cargo insta review` looks cool! I wanted to dedup the cases variable, but my Rust skill is not good enough to declare a global vector.
…atter (getzola#2237) * Prevent spans crossing line boundaries in class formatter * Add snapshot tests for classed highlighting
* sort page.assets by filename Uses .to_str() to sort files and subfolders. The .unwrap() may need work or be replaced by unwrap_or_default(). Given earlier checks in the function it should work however. * add tests for assets sorting * fix rustfmt * use existing loop instead of windows * also check the non-recursive test * use .zip() and add assert msg
* templates:atom: add support for multiple authors Atom 1.0 [0] support multiple `<author>` entries in the feed. This commit modified the template to generate as many `<author>` as the page's metadata contains. [0] https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/atom.html#recommendedEntryElements * Test we can have multiple authors in ATOM feeds
The `rel` and `type` HTML attributes are needed in the `base_url` (or `section.permalink`) link so feed aggregators know that's the HTML page that corresponds to the atom feed. Note: The RSS template doesn't have this issue.
…fig file not present (getzola#2262)
* use fs canonicalize to prevent path traversal * fix cargo fmt
* Add ignored_static to config * Make handle ignored static files correctly * cargo fmt * Match on relative path rather than incorrect target path * path -> partial path for serve static ignore * remove debug println * copy static directory if there is no ignored globset * Update docs * Deduplicate code with additional Option argument * cargo fmt
…etzola#2287) The warning about unknown highlight languages was displayed even when code highlighting was disabled via `markdown.highlight_code = false`. This commit adds a condition to check this setting before issuing the warning, effectively suppressing it when code highlighting is disabled. Issue: getzola#2280
* Fixed "unnecessary mut" warning * Fixed minor typo * Use more than 8 threads for links checking if hardware supports it * Fixed failing azure Linux check * Avoid unnecessary HTTP requests to the same, already checked links
Co-authored-by: Sandor Apati <[email protected]>
* Make a test that replicates the issue regarding section paths not respecting page parents * Add a very rudimentary working implementation that passes the test * Rewrite solution to be more idiomatic rust
asimpletune
force-pushed
the
next_issue-2368
branch
from
December 10, 2023 16:39
104ae2d
to
b98420e
Compare
Keats
force-pushed
the
next
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 24, 2024 21:04
8b1a413
to
67c2fe0
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR addresses issue #2368 which was also discussed on the zola discourse here
Make a test that replicates the issue regarding section paths not respecting page parents
Add a very rudimentary working implementation that passes the test
Rewrite solution to be more idiomatic rust
IMPORTANT: Please do not create a Pull Request adding a new feature without discussing it first.
The place to discuss new features is the forum: https://zola.discourse.group/
If you want to add a new feature, please open a thread there first in the feature requests section.
Sanity check:
Code changes
(Delete or ignore this section for documentation changes)
next
branch?If the change is a new feature or adding to/changing an existing one:
* [ ] Have you created/updated the relevant documentation page(s)?