Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ref(compose): Separate ingest consumers #2193

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2023

Conversation

jan-auer
Copy link
Member

@jan-auer jan-auer commented Jun 7, 2023

Ingest consumers will stop to support the --all-consumer-types option, and
instead will need to run separate instances for events, attachments, and
transactions.

See getsentry/sentry#49957

@jan-auer jan-auer self-assigned this Jun 7, 2023
@jan-auer jan-auer requested a review from untitaker June 7, 2023 12:18
@BYK
Copy link
Member

BYK commented Jun 7, 2023

Anyway we can keep the --all option around for small-scale self-hosted versions?

@BYK
Copy link
Member

BYK commented Jun 7, 2023

See getsentry/snuba#1670 for context (and all the tickets referencing that one)

@jan-auer
Copy link
Member Author

jan-auer commented Jun 7, 2023

👍 thanks for the pointer @BYK! I'm aware that the team is currently looking into standardizing the consumer CLI options, which would make it easier to also add a single consumers command that then spawns all of them in default configuration.

@jan-auer jan-auer merged commit e76c234 into master Jun 7, 2023
@jan-auer jan-auer deleted the ref/ingest-consumer-separation branch June 7, 2023 14:23
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants