Dokan vendor dashboard react router dev doc #2404
Conversation
…mponent in dokan lite.
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a comprehensive update to the project's styling and routing components. Key changes include the addition of a Tailwind CSS configuration file and a corresponding SCSS file for styling. The documentation is enhanced with instructions for creating custom routes and components. New React components for the dashboard layout are implemented, along with a routing system that includes a 404 error handling route. Additionally, several new dependencies are added to support the updated functionality, and modifications are made to the Webpack configuration to accommodate the new entry points. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (15)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 LanguageTool
🪛 Markdownlint
🔇 Additional comments (24)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Aunshon
changed the base branch from
develop
to
update/vendor-dashboard-structure
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (23)
src/Layout/404.tsx (2)
1-7: LGTM! Consider enhancing the 404 page with more information or styling.The
NotFoundcomponent is implemented correctly as a functional component. It serves its purpose as a basic 404 page. However, consider the following suggestions to improve user experience:
- Add more informative content, such as a brief explanation or a link back to the home page.
- Apply some basic styling to make the page more visually appealing and consistent with your application's design.
Example enhancement:
import React from 'react'; import { Link } from 'react-router-dom'; const NotFound: React.FC = () => { return ( <div className="not-found-container"> <h1>404 - Page Not Found</h1> <p>The page you are looking for doesn't exist or has been moved.</p> <Link to="/">Go back to homepage</Link> </div> ); } export default NotFound;
1-1: Consider adding import statement and type annotation.To improve code quality and maintainability, consider the following suggestions:
Add an import statement for React at the beginning of the file:
import React from 'react';Add a type annotation for the component:
const NotFound: React.FC = () => { // ... component implementation }These changes will enhance type safety and make the code more consistent with TypeScript best practices in React applications.
src/Layout/Footer.tsx (2)
3-5: Consider adding PropTypes and JSDoc commentsThe
Footercomponent is correctly implemented using an arrow function, which is consistent with modern React practices. However, to improve code quality and maintainability, consider the following suggestions:
- Add PropTypes for type checking (even if the component currently doesn't accept any props, it's good practice for future-proofing).
- Include JSDoc comments to describe the component's purpose and any future expected props.
Here's an example of how you could enhance the component:
import { Slot } from "@wordpress/components"; import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; /** * Footer component that renders a slot for dynamic content injection. * * @return {JSX.Element} The Footer component. */ const Footer = () => { return <Slot name="dokan-footer-area" />; }; Footer.propTypes = { // Add any future props here }; export default Footer;This change would improve the component's documentation and make it more maintainable in the long run.
1-7: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for minor improvementsThe
Footercomponent is well-implemented, leveraging the WordPress Slot/Fill system effectively for dynamic content injection. The code is concise and focused on a single responsibility, which aligns well with React best practices.To further enhance the quality of this component:
- Consider adding PropTypes for future-proofing and type safety.
- Include JSDoc comments to improve documentation.
- If this component is part of a TypeScript project, consider using TypeScript interfaces instead of PropTypes for even better type safety.
These suggestions will make the component more robust and easier to maintain as the project grows.
src/base-tailwind.scss (2)
5-21: Custom table reset styles are well-implemented.The custom style layer effectively resets table styles within the
.dokan-layoutclass, providing a consistent base for further styling. The use of@layer baseand the specific selector are appropriate.Consider adding a comment explaining why this reset is necessary, e.g.:
// Reset unwanted table styles but keep structure intact // This ensures consistent table rendering across different browsers and prevents conflicts with Tailwind's base styles @layer base { // ... (rest of the code) }
1-21: Overall, the file is well-structured and follows best practices.This new SCSS file successfully integrates Tailwind CSS and provides custom table reset styles. The structure is clean, and the custom styles are well-scoped to avoid conflicts. The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing the vendor dashboard's styling.
As the project grows, consider splitting custom styles into separate files if they become more complex, to maintain modularity and ease of maintenance.
src/Layout/Header.tsx (3)
3-3: LGTM: Component declaration is well-structured. Consider adding TypeScript types.The
Headercomponent is correctly declared as a functional component with a default prop value, which is a good practice. To further improve type safety and code clarity, consider adding TypeScript types:interface HeaderProps { title?: string; } const Header: React.FC<HeaderProps> = ({ title = '' }) => { // ... };This change would make the component's interface more explicit and provide better IDE support.
5-17: Component structure is flexible, but consider simplifying the styling.The use of
Slotcomponents for customization is excellent, allowing for flexible content insertion. However, the styling approach raises a few points:
The utility classes suggest the use of a CSS framework like Tailwind. Ensure this is consistent with the project's styling guidelines.
The title styling is quite complex for a header component. Consider if this level of styling is necessary or if it could be simplified for better maintainability.
The gradient effect on the title might be excessive for a header. Consider if this aligns with the overall design system of the application.
Would you like suggestions on how to potentially simplify the styling while maintaining the desired visual effect?
1-20: Overall, well-structured component with room for minor enhancements.The
Headercomponent is well-implemented, providing good flexibility through the use ofSlotcomponents. The code structure follows modern React practices and is generally clean and readable.Suggestions for improvement:
- Add TypeScript types for better type safety and code clarity.
- Consider simplifying the title styling for better maintainability.
- Ensure the styling approach (likely using a CSS framework like Tailwind) aligns with the project's styling guidelines.
These enhancements would further improve an already solid component implementation.
src/Dashboard/index.tsx (3)
1-9: LGTM! Consider optimizing imports.The imports are appropriate for the application's needs, integrating WordPress libraries, React Router, and local components.
Consider destructuring the React Router imports for a cleaner import statement:
-import { - createBrowserRouter, createHashRouter, - RouterProvider, -} from "react-router-dom"; +import { createHashRouter, RouterProvider } from "react-router-dom";Note that
createBrowserRouteris imported but not used. You may want to remove it if it's not needed elsewhere in the file.
11-28: LGTM! Consider adding type safety.The App component is well-structured and efficiently sets up routing for the dashboard.
To improve type safety and maintainability, consider adding TypeScript interfaces for the route objects:
interface Route { path: string; element: React.ReactNode; title: string; } const App = () => { const routes: Route[] = getRoutes(); // ... rest of the component }This will help catch potential errors early and improve code documentation.
30-36: LGTM! Consider safer DOM element selection.The DOM Ready function correctly ensures that the React application is only rendered when the DOM is fully loaded, which is crucial for WordPress integration.
To improve type safety and error handling, consider replacing the non-null assertion with a null check:
domReady(function () { const rootElement = document.querySelector('.dashboard-content-area'); if (rootElement) { const root = createRoot(rootElement); root.render(<App />); } else { console.error('Dashboard content area not found'); } });This approach provides better error handling and avoids potential runtime errors if the element is not found.
src/Routing/index.tsx (1)
8-19: Consider removing commented-out code.The commented-out route object from lines 8-19 may clutter the file and potentially become outdated. It's generally better to remove unused code and rely on version control to track changes if needed.
If this code is intended for future use, consider moving it to a separate document or creating a GitHub issue to track its implementation.
docs/dokan-routes.md (6)
1-17: LGTM! Consider adding a brief explanation of Tailwind CSS.The introduction and the section on creating a custom Tailwind configuration are clear and well-structured. The code snippet is properly formatted and includes helpful comments.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what Tailwind CSS is and why it's being used in this context. This would be helpful for developers who might be new to Tailwind or the Dokan project.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
1-1: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
28-39: Clear instructions with a good example. Consider adding TypeScript.The section provides clear instructions for creating a new component, including a helpful reminder about importing the
tailwind.scssfile. The sample React component effectively demonstrates the use of Tailwind classes.Consider providing a TypeScript version of the component example. This would align with modern best practices and provide type safety. Here's a suggested TypeScript version:
import React from 'react'; import './tailwind.scss'; interface ComponentProps { // Add any props here } const Component: React.FC<ComponentProps> = (props) => { return ( <div className="bg-gradient-to-r from-red-600 via-green-500 to-yellow-600 inline-block text-transparent bg-clip-text"> This is my component body... </div> ); }; export default Component;🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
28-28: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
41-55: Clear instructions for route registration. Consider adding type information.The section provides clear instructions for registering the new route and component. The code snippet is well-structured and includes all necessary properties for a route object. The use of the
__()function for internationalization is a good practice.Consider adding type information for the route object to improve type safety and developer experience. Here's a suggested improvement:
import { RouteObject } from 'react-router-dom'; const newRoute: RouteObject = { id: 'your-page', title: __( 'Your page heading...', 'dokan-lite' ), element: <Component/>, path: 'your-page', exact: true, order: 10, parent: '', }; routes.push(newRoute);This assumes that you're using
react-router-domv6 or later. If you're using a different version or a custom route type, please adjust accordingly.
57-65: Enhance the color customizer support section with usage examples.While the list of Dokan-specific colors is clear, this section could be improved by providing more context and examples.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add a brief explanation of how these colors are used in the Dokan system.
- Provide examples of how to use these colors in Tailwind classes or CSS variables.
- If possible, include a visual representation or link to a color palette for these Dokan-specific colors.
For example:
## Color Customizer support for components Dokan provides a set of predefined colors for consistent styling across the application. These colors can be used in Tailwind classes or as CSS variables. ### Dokan Specific Colors - `dokan-sidebar`: Used for sidebar background - `dokan-sidebar-hover`: Used for sidebar hover states - `dokan-btn`: Used for primary button color - `dokan-btn-hover`: Used for button hover states ### Usage Examples In Tailwind classes: ```html <div class="bg-dokan-sidebar hover:bg-dokan-sidebar-hover"> <button class="bg-dokan-btn hover:bg-dokan-btn-hover">Click me</button> </div>As CSS variables:
.custom-element { background-color: var(--dokan-sidebar-color); color: var(--dokan-btn-color); }--- `66-67`: **Enhance the color usage section with examples and improve grammar.** The explanation of color usage is helpful, but it could be improved with code examples and a minor grammatical correction. 1. Consider adding code examples to illustrate the usage of these colors in different contexts. 2. The sentence structure can be improved for clarity. Here's a suggested revision with examples: ```markdown ## Color Usage Dokan-specific colors can be used in various contexts: - For backgrounds: `.bg-dokan-btn` will use the `--dokan-button-background-color` variable. - For text: `.text-dokan-btn` will use the appropriate text color derived from the variable. - For borders: `.border-dokan-btn` will use the correct border color from the variable. Examples: ```html <button class="bg-dokan-btn text-white hover:bg-dokan-btn-hover"> Click me </button> <div class="border-2 border-dokan-sidebar p-4"> <p class="text-dokan-btn">This text uses the button color</p> </div>These classes ensure consistent use of Dokan's color scheme across your components.
This revision provides clear examples and improves the readability of the explanation. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary><blockquote> [uncategorized] ~67-~67: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it. Context: ...on-background-color` variable and other use of the color name such as `.text-dokan-... (AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `1-1`: **Remove trailing punctuation from headings.** To improve consistency with Markdown best practices, remove the trailing periods from the following headings: 1. Line 1: Change "Register a new `route` and `component` in dokan lite." to "Register a new `route` and `component` in dokan lite" 2. Line 28: Change "Create the component that you want to show when visit your specific route." to "Create the component that you want to show when visit your specific route" These changes will resolve the Markdownlint warnings and improve the overall consistency of the document. Also applies to: 28-28 <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> 1-1: Punctuation: '.' Trailing punctuation in heading (MD026, no-trailing-punctuation) </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>package.json (1)</summary><blockquote> `56-63`: **Approve new dependencies and suggest version pinning.** The addition of React Router DOM (`react-router-dom`) aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. The inclusion of various WordPress-related dependencies (`@wordpress/components`, `@wordpress/data`, etc.) is also appropriate for a WordPress plugin like Dokan, facilitating integration with WordPress core functionality. Consider pinning the exact versions of these dependencies instead of using the caret (`^`) notation. This ensures better reproducibility and prevents potential issues from minor updates. For example: ```json "dependencies": { "@wordpress/components": "28.9.0", "@wordpress/data": "10.9.0", "@wordpress/dom-ready": "4.9.0", "@wordpress/element": "6.9.0", "@wordpress/hooks": "4.9.0", "@wordpress/i18n": "5.8.0", "@wordpress/plugins": "7.10.0", "react-router-dom": "6.27.0" }This practice can help maintain consistency across different environments and prevent unexpected behavior due to automatic minor version updates.
base-tailwind.config.js (1)
12-55: Well-structured theme extensions with a minor consistency suggestion.The theme extensions are well-organized, using CSS variables for flexible color definitions. This approach allows for easy customization and theming.
For consistency, consider using the same structure for the
colorsobject as used inbackgroundColor,textColor, andborderColor. For example:colors: { - primary: 'var(--dokan-button-background-color, #F05025)', dokan: { + primary: 'var(--dokan-button-background-color, #F05025)', sidebar: 'var(--dokan-button-background-color, #1B233B)', btn: 'var(--dokan-button-background-color, #F05025)', }, },This change would maintain a consistent nesting structure throughout the theme configuration.
webpack.config.js (2)
Line range hint
70-76: Resolve configuration updated with new aliases.The changes in the resolve section are well-structured:
- Spreading
defaultConfig.resolveensures compatibility with existing WordPress scripts.- New aliases for 'frontend' and 'admin' improve code organization and import readability.
These updates support the new frontend entry point while maintaining consistency with existing configurations.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of these aliases for future maintainers. For example:
alias: { // ... existing aliases ... // Aliases for easier imports of frontend and admin modules 'frontend': path.resolve('./src/frontend/'), 'admin': path.resolve('./src/admin/'), },
TypeScript Configuration Missing
The verification process identified the following issues related to TypeScript support:
TypeScript loader (
ts-loader) is not configured inwebpack.config.js.
Addts-loaderto handle.tsand.tsxfiles properly.
tsconfig.jsonfile is missing.
Create atsconfig.jsonto define TypeScript compiler options and settings.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-180: Consider refactoring for improved maintainability and TypeScript support.While the changes made are correct, there are a few suggestions for improving the overall structure and functionality:
The webpack configuration file is handling multiple parts of the project (frontend, admin, Vue.js, etc.). Consider splitting this into separate configuration files for better maintainability.
With the addition of a TypeScript entry point ('./src/Dashboard/index.tsx'), ensure that proper TypeScript processing is set up. You might need to add or modify the module rules to include a TypeScript loader.
Review if any additional externals or plugins are needed for the new React-based frontend.
Here's a suggestion for splitting the configuration:
- Create a base config file with common settings.
- Create separate config files for frontend, admin, and Vue.js that extend the base config.
- Use webpack-merge to combine these configurations.
This approach will make it easier to manage and scale different parts of your application independently.
To ensure TypeScript is properly configured, run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify TypeScript configuration # Test: Check if TypeScript loader is configured if grep -q "ts-loader" webpack.config.js; then echo "TypeScript loader is configured." else echo "Warning: TypeScript loader not found in webpack config. You may need to add it for proper TypeScript processing." fi # Test: Check if TypeScript config file exists if [ -f "tsconfig.json" ]; then echo "tsconfig.json file found." else echo "Warning: tsconfig.json not found. You may need to add it for TypeScript configuration." fiLength of output: 482
🛑 Comments failed to post (10)
src/Layout/ContentArea.tsx (1)
5-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider separating layout concerns for improved reusability.
The component structure is well-organized and uses fragments appropriately. The use of
Slotcomponents for flexible content insertion is a good practice. However, including theSidebarcomponent directly withinContentAreamight limit its reusability.Consider lifting the
Sidebarcomponent to a higher-level layout component. This would makeContentAreamore flexible and reusable in different contexts. Here's a suggested refactor:-import Sidebar from './Sidebar'; import {Slot} from "@wordpress/components"; const ContentArea = ( { children } ) => { return ( - <> - <Sidebar /> <div className="dokan-layout-content-area"> <Slot name="dokan-layout-content-area-before" /> { children } <Slot name="dokan-layout-content-area-after" /> </div> - </> ); };Then, create a new
Layoutcomponent that composesSidebarandContentArea:import Sidebar from './Sidebar'; import ContentArea from './ContentArea'; const Layout = ({ children }) => ( <> <Sidebar /> <ContentArea>{children}</ContentArea> </> ); export default Layout;This approach would make both
ContentAreaandLayoutmore flexible and easier to maintain.src/Dashboard/index.tsx (1)
14-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Address TODO and consider optimizing route mapping.
The TODO comment about adding parent route support should be addressed. Consider implementing this feature or removing the comment if it's not applicable.
The route mapping could be simplified and made more flexible:
const mappedRoutes = routes.map(({ path, element, title, ...rest }) => ({ path, element: <Layout route={{ path, element, title, ...rest }} title={title}>{element}</Layout>, ...rest }));This approach allows for easier addition of new properties to routes in the future and reduces the need for changes in multiple places.
src/Routing/index.tsx (1)
21-62: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issuePlaceholder elements detected in route definitions.
The verification script identified placeholder
<h1>elements in the following route definitions withinsrc/Routing/index.tsx:
dokan-koladokan-basedokan-settingsdokan-store-settingsPlease replace these placeholders with the appropriate components to ensure proper functionality and user experience.
🔗 Analysis chain
Review and update route definitions.
The route definitions are structurally consistent, which is good. However, there are a few points to consider:
- The elements are currently placeholder
<h1>tags. These should be replaced with actual components for production use.- The 'Kola bagan' route (lines 21-30) seems out of place or may be a placeholder. Please clarify its purpose or remove if not needed.
- The use of
__()for titles is excellent for internationalization.To ensure all route components are properly implemented, run the following script:
If this script returns results, it indicates that there are still placeholder elements that need to be replaced with actual components.
Refining verification scripts to ensure accurate detection of placeholder elements.
The previous script encountered errors due to incorrect file type specification and syntax issues. To accurately verify that all route elements are actual components and not placeholders, please run the following corrected script:
Refining the verification script to correctly search TypeScript and TSX files for placeholder elements.
The previous script failed due to an unrecognized file type. To accurately verify that all route elements are actual components and not placeholders, please run the following corrected script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all route elements are actual components, not placeholders. # Test: Search for placeholder h1 tags in route definitions rg --type typescript 'element:\s*<h1>' src/RoutingLength of output: 200
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all route elements are actual components, not placeholders. # Test: Search for placeholder h1 tags in route definitions rg --type tsx 'element:\s*<h1>' src/RoutingLength of output: 73
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all route elements are actual components, not placeholders. # Test: Search for placeholder h1 tags in route definitions within .ts and .tsx files rg 'element:\s*<h1>' src/Routing --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 331
webpack.config.js (1)
12-12: 💡 Codebase verification
Build process warnings: TypeScript loader and tsconfig.json missing.
The build process encountered warnings indicating that the TypeScript loader is not found in
webpack.config.jsand thattsconfig.jsonis missing. These are essential for processing TypeScript files correctly. Please address these issues to ensure the new frontend entry point is built successfully.🔗 Analysis chain
New entry point added for frontend dashboard.
The addition of the 'frontend' entry point aligns with the PR objectives of integrating React Router into the vendor dashboard. This is a good step towards modernizing the frontend architecture.
Please ensure that this new entry point is correctly integrated into the build process. Run the following script to verify:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new entry point is correctly built # Test: Check if the output file is generated npm run build if [ -f "./assets/js/frontend.js" ]; then echo "frontend.js file successfully generated." else echo "Error: frontend.js file not found in the output directory." fiLength of output: 482
src/Layout/index.tsx (4)
39-40: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use
React.ReactNodeforheaderComponentandfooterComponentpropsUsing
React.ReactNodeprovides more flexibility, as it includes all renderable React elements, not justJSX.Element. Update your types as follows:interface LayoutProps { children: React.ReactNode; route: DokanRoute; title?: string; - headerComponent?: JSX.Element; - footerComponent?: JSX.Element; + headerComponent?: React.ReactNode; + footerComponent?: React.ReactNode; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.headerComponent?: React.ReactNode; footerComponent?: React.ReactNode;
27-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the types of
iconandelementby usingReact.ReactNodeSince
JSX.Elementis a subtype ofReact.ReactNode, specifying both is redundant. You can simplify the types as follows:export type DokanRoute = { id: string; title?: string; - icon?: JSX.Element | React.ReactNode; - element: JSX.Element | React.ReactNode; + icon?: React.ReactNode; + element: React.ReactNode; path: string; exact?: boolean; order?: number; parent?: string; };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.icon?: React.ReactNode; element: React.ReactNode;
70-72:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling in
useThemehook to prevent usage outside ofThemeProviderIf
useThemeis called outside of aThemeProvider,useContext(ThemeContext)may returnundefined, leading to runtime errors. Consider adding a check to provide a clearer error message:export const useTheme = () => { const context = useContext( ThemeContext ); + if ( context === undefined ) { + throw new Error( 'useTheme must be used within a ThemeProvider' ); + } return context; };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const useTheme = () => { const context = useContext( ThemeContext ); if ( context === undefined ) { throw new Error( 'useTheme must be used within a ThemeProvider' ); } return context; };
11-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Define explicit types for ThemeContext and ThemeProvider for better type safety
Currently,
ThemeContextis initialized withcreateContext(null), andThemeProviderdoes not specify prop types. This can lead to type issues in components that consume this context.Consider defining a type for your theme context value and typing your components. Here's how you can update your code:
+interface ThemeContextType { + theme: string; + setTheme: React.Dispatch<React.SetStateAction<string>>; +} -const ThemeContext = createContext( null ); +const ThemeContext = createContext<ThemeContextType | undefined>( undefined ); +interface ThemeProviderProps { + children: React.ReactNode; +} -const ThemeProvider = ( { children } ) => { +const ThemeProvider: React.FC<ThemeProviderProps> = ( { children } ) => { const [ theme, setTheme ] = useState( 'light' ); // Example theme state return ( <ThemeContext.Provider value={ { theme, setTheme } }> { children } </ThemeContext.Provider> ); };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.interface ThemeContextType { theme: string; setTheme: React.Dispatch<React.SetStateAction<string>>; } const ThemeContext = createContext<ThemeContextType | undefined>( undefined ); interface ThemeProviderProps { children: React.ReactNode; } const ThemeProvider: React.FC<ThemeProviderProps> = ( { children } ) => { const [ theme, setTheme ] = useState( 'light' ); // Example theme state return ( <ThemeContext.Provider value={ { theme, setTheme } }> { children } </ThemeContext.Provider> ); };includes/Assets.php (2)
372-372:
⚠️ Potential issueRename variable '$frontend_shipping_asset' to reflect its purpose
The variable
$frontend_shipping_assetseems to store asset information for thedokan-react-frontendscript rather than shipping assets. To improve clarity and maintainability, consider renaming it to$frontend_asset.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
-$frontend_shipping_asset = require DOKAN_DIR . '/assets/js/frontend.asset.php'; +$frontend_asset = require DOKAN_DIR . '/assets/js/frontend.asset.php';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.$frontend_asset = require DOKAN_DIR . '/assets/js/frontend.asset.php';
562-566:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate variable reference to match the renamed variable
After renaming
$frontend_shipping_assetto$frontend_asset, ensure that the references in the script registration are updated accordingly to prevent any undefined variable errors.Apply this diff to update the variable references:
'dokan-react-frontend' => [ 'src' => $asset_url . '/js/frontend.js', - 'deps' => $frontend_shipping_asset['dependencies'], - 'version' => $frontend_shipping_asset['version'], + 'deps' => $frontend_asset['dependencies'], + 'version' => $frontend_asset['version'], ],Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
All Submissions:
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Added react router dev doc for developers
Related Pull Request(s)
PR Self Review Checklist:
FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Documentation
Bug Fixes