-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 671
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Newbie] Supporting Yunikorn and Kueue #5915
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
6bd5fb6
7641f32
02e35df
590d64a
20d5672
bb8a0ec
2c12357
9a732c7
ae9f6b9
9ed6b05
552a800
b71b749
3fc572f
e64beb0
539eff6
9d511e3
d6a420a
e9c401a
4387d58
87ee532
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ | ||
# [Newbie] Supporting Yunikorn and Kueue | ||
|
||
**Authors:** | ||
|
||
- @yuteng | ||
|
||
## 1 Executive Summary | ||
|
||
Providing kubernetes (k8s) resource management, gang scheduling and preemption for flyte applications by third-party software, including Apache Yunikorn and Kueue. | ||
|
||
## 2 Motivation | ||
|
||
Flyte supports multi-tenancy and various Kubernetes plugins. | ||
Some Kubernetes plugins may encounter into resource wastage when jobs partially start without performing any meaningful work. | ||
A solution to this issue is gang scheduling, which guarantees that all worker pods derived from a CRD are scheduled simultaneously. | ||
Kueue or Apache Yunikorn support this mechanism. | ||
Additionally, Yunikorn can map tenants and organizations to hierarchical queues to define resource quotas. | ||
Based on this setting, access control lists can be configured to grant access to users and groups. | ||
|
||
## 3 Proposed Implementation | ||
|
||
Kueue | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
queueconfig: | ||
scheduler: yunikorn | ||
jobs: | ||
- type: "ray" | ||
gangscheduling: "placeholderTimeoutInSeconds=60 gangSchedulingStyle=hard" | ||
allow-preemption: false | ||
- type: "spark" | ||
gangscheduling: "placeholderTimeoutInSeconds=30 gangSchedulingStyle=hard" | ||
allow-preemption: true | ||
``` | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is this list complete or an example? I.e. will this also work for plugins like kubeflow pytorch, tf, mpi or dask, ...? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is an example. |
||
|
||
`root.organization1.ray` is the queue of the ray job submitted by user1 belonging organization1. | ||
|
||
ResourceFlavor allocates resource based on labels which indicates that category-based resource allocation by organization label is available. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could you please explain how the the reseource flavor will be determined? Is there a way to automatically derive this from the task decorator args It would be really nice if tasks that need e.g. an A100 GPU were automatically not in the same queue as tasks that need 2 x T4 GPUs. We're using kubeflow pytorch jobs with scheduler plugins' gang scheduling and have observed jobs being starved that the cluster would have had resources for because other jobs which were trying to get different GPU types couldn't be scheduled but which had a higher priority. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. No, need to create Kueue CRDs first.
In the other hand, kueue preemption requires Kueue WorkloadPriorityClass and patching job with label. |
||
Thus, a clusterQueue including multiple resources represents the total acessaible resource for an organization. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't understand this sentence tbh, could you please explain/expand? |
||
| clusterQueue | localQueue | | ||
| --- | --- | | ||
| <organization name> | ray、spark、default | | ||
A tenant can submit organization-specific tasks to queues such as organization.ray, organization.spark and organization.default to track which job types are submittable. | ||
|
||
A scheduling plugin implements functions `SetSchedulerName`, `CreateLabels` and `CreateGroupLabels` to create labels and `schedulerName`. | ||
`CreateLabels` patches necassary labels, such as `queuename`, `user-info` and `applcationID`, to jobs. | ||
`CreateGroupLabels` supports creating `group-pod` and `task-group` labels based on incoming CRD if need. | ||
`SetSchedulerName` set `schedulerName` field in `podTemplate`. | ||
|
||
```go | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why not have a single interface and two implementations of the same interface for yunikorn and kueue? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I would prefer in There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Agree, i updated the document.. |
||
type SchedulePlugin interface { | ||
CreateLabels(taskCtx pluginsCore.TaskExecutionMetadata, o client.Object, cfg *config.K8sPluginConfig) | ||
CreateGroupLabels(ctx context.Context, object client.Object, taskTmpl *core.TaskTemplate) | ||
GetGroupLabels() (labels, annotations map[string]string) | ||
SetSchedulerName(object client.Object) | ||
} | ||
|
||
type YunikornScheduablePlugin struct { | ||
jobs map[string]string | ||
Labels map[string]string | ||
Annotations map[string]string | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (yk *YunikornSchedulPlugin) GetGroupLabels() (labels, annotations map[string]string) { | ||
return yk.Labels, yk.Annotations | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (yk *YunikornSchedulePlugin) CreateLabels(taskCtx pluginsCore.TaskExecutionMetadata, o client.Object, cfg *config.K8sPluginConfig) (labels, annotations map[string]string) { | ||
// Set queue name based on the job type and flyteidl.Identifier fields including "ResourceType", "Org" and "Name". | ||
// 1.Clean yk.Labels and yk.Annotations | ||
// 2.Add yunikorn.apache.org/user.info = <organization>.<Name> | ||
// 3.Add yunikorn.apache.org/app-id = <ResourceType>-<uuid> | ||
// 4.Add yunikorn.apache.org/queue = <organization>.<jobType> | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (yk *YunikornSchedulePlugin) CreateGroupLabels(ctx context.Context, object client.Object, taskTmpl *core.TaskTemplate) { | ||
// 1.Add yunikorn.apache.org/task-group-name = yk.CreateTaskgroupName(ResourceType) | ||
// 2.Add yunikorn.apache.org/task-groups = yk.CreateTaskgroup(object) | ||
// 3.Add yunikorn.apache.org/schedulingPolicyParameters = yk.jobs[ResourceType] | ||
// 4.Add yunikorn.apache.org/allow-preemption = true/false | ||
} | ||
|
||
type KueueScheduablePlugin struct { | ||
jobs map[string]string | ||
Labels map[string]string | ||
Annotations map[string]string | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (k *KueueScheduablePlugin) GetGroupLabels() (labels, annotations map[string]string) { | ||
return k.Labels, k.Annotations | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (k *KueueScheduablePlugin) CreateLabels(taskCtx pluginsCore.TaskExecutionMetadata, o client.Object, cfg *config.K8sPluginConfig) (labels, annotations map[string]string) { | ||
// Set queue name based on the job type and flyteidl.Identifier field "Org". | ||
// Clean k.Labels and k.Annotations | ||
// 1.Add kueue.x-k8s.io/queue-name = <organization>.<jobtype> | ||
// Update k.Labels and k.Annotations | ||
} | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Do any additional k8s resources have to be created for the queues or does a queue exist as soon as a pod has an annotation with a new queue name? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, Kueue CRDs describe the quota a queue when adopting Kueue. In the other hand, queues are configured by setting [Yunikorn configuration] (https://yunikorn.apache.org/docs/user_guide/queue_config) if adopting Yunikorn. |
||
func (k *KueueScheduablePlugin) CreateGroupLabels(ctx context.Context, object client.Object, taskTmpl *core.TaskTemplate) { | ||
// Add Label "kueue.x-k8s.io/pod-group-name" and "kueue.x-k8s.io/pod-group-total-count" for spark、dask. | ||
// If object type is ray CRD and kubeflow CRD which are supported by Kueue then skips. | ||
// Update k.Labels and k.Annotations | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
When a job comes, following things happens. | ||
1. `SetSchedulerName` sets the `schedulerName` with the specific scheduler name | ||
2. `CreateLabels` new basic labels based on the scheduler. | ||
3. `CreateGroupLabels` creates `kueue.x-k8s.io/pod-group-name` or `yunikorn.apache.org/task-groups` according to the calculatied results from CRD. | ||
4. Merging labels and annotations from `CreateLabels` and `CreateGroupLabels` to the CRD. | ||
|
||
```go | ||
type PluginManager struct { | ||
id string | ||
plugin k8s.Plugin | ||
resourceToWatch runtime.Object | ||
kubeClient pluginsCore.KubeClient | ||
metrics PluginMetrics | ||
// Per namespace-resource | ||
backOffController *backoff.Controller | ||
resourceLevelMonitor *ResourceLevelMonitor | ||
eventWatcher EventWatcher | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (e *PluginManager) launchResource(ctx context.Context, tCtx pluginsCore.TaskExecutionContext) (pluginsCore.Transition, error) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe |
||
o, err := e.plugin.BuildResource(ctx, k8sTaskCtx) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return pluginsCore.UnknownTransition, err | ||
} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Would be nice to not have |
||
if p, ok := e.plugin.(k8s.ScheduablePlugin); ok { | ||
o, err = p.SetSchedulerName(o) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return pluginsCore.UnknownTransition, err | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (e *PluginManager) addObjectMetadata(taskCtx pluginsCore.TaskExecutionMetadata, o client.Object, cfg *config.K8sPluginConfig) { | ||
var schedulerLabels, schedulerAnnotations map[string]string | ||
if p, ok := e.plugin.(k8s.ScheduablePlugin); ok { | ||
o, err = p.SetSchedulerName(o) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return pluginsCore.UnknownTransition, err | ||
} | ||
p.CreateLabels(taskCtx, o) | ||
p.CreateGroupLabels(taskCtx, o) | ||
schedulerLabels, schedulerAnnotations = e.plugin.GetLabels() | ||
} | ||
o.SetNamespace(taskCtx.GetNamespace()) | ||
o.SetAnnotations(pluginsUtils.UnionMaps(cfg.DefaultAnnotations, o.GetAnnotations(), pluginsUtils.CopyMap(taskCtx.GetAnnotations(), schedulerAnnotations))) | ||
o.SetLabels(pluginsUtils.UnionMaps(cfg.DefaultLabels, o.GetLabels(), pluginsUtils.CopyMap(taskCtx.GetLabels(), schedulerLabels))) | ||
o.SetName(taskCtx.GetTaskExecutionID().GetGeneratedName()) | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
## 4 Metrics & Dashboards | ||
|
||
1. The Yunikorn scheduler add applications to a specific queue based on their user info, queue name for any application type. | ||
2. Yunikorn and Kueue provide gang scheduling through annotations For Ray and spark. | ||
3. Preemption behavior aligns with user-defined configuration in yunikorn. | ||
|
||
## 5 Drawbacks | ||
|
||
This appoarch doesn't offer a way to maintain consistency between the accuate resource quotas of groups and the configuration in scheduler. | ||
|
||
## 6 Alternatives | ||
|
||
## 7 Potential Impact and Dependencies | ||
|
||
Flyte support Spark, Ray and Kubeflow CRDs including Pytorch and TFjobs. | ||
The Spark and Ray operators have supported Yunikorn gang scheduling since task group calculation were implemented in these operators. | ||
Taskgroup calculation implementation in pods aspect in flyte or kubeflow is required for supporting kubeflow CRDs. | ||
In the other hand, Kueue currently doesn't support Spark CRD. | ||
| Operator | Yunikorn | Kueue | | ||
| --- | --- | --- | | ||
| Spark | v | x | | ||
| Ray | v | v | | ||
| Kubeflow | x | v | | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. From what I understand, one only needs to add labels/annotations on the worker pods. Can't we do this purely from flyte by modifying the pod template spec of the respective CRD? What do the operators have to do in addition to that? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, current progress fetch the pod templates from CRDs and patch label on them. |
||
## 8 Unresolved questions | ||
|
||
## 9 Conclusion | ||
|
||
Yunikorn and Kueue support gang scheduling allowing all necassary pods to run sumultaneously when required resource are available. | ||
Yunikorn provides preemption calculating the priority of applications based on their priority class and priority score of the queue where they are submitted, in order to trigger high-prioirty or emergency application immediately. | ||
Yunikorn's hierarchical queue includes grarateed resources settings and ACLs. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Nit: Could you please run the doc through a spelling checker? Thank you 🙇 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yes, i ran the make spellcheck in the latest commit :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please explain what preemption means here compared to what preemption means in the context of spot instances on e.g. AWS or GCP?