Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix BZZ economics #45

Open
wants to merge 18 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix BZZ economics #45

wants to merge 18 commits into from

Conversation

jpritikin
Copy link

No description provided.

@0xCandy
Copy link

0xCandy commented Mar 4, 2024

Thanks for your hardwork and contributions! It is a great job!

@0xCandy
Copy link

0xCandy commented Mar 4, 2024

"Send 10% of the BZZ stamp payment to the Swarm Foundation owned Uniswap v2 DAI-BZZ pool before sending the remainder to the redistribution lottery." - BZZ stamp is bought on Gnosis, but sent to Ethereum?

@jpritikin
Copy link
Author

jpritikin commented Mar 4, 2024

"Send 10% of the BZZ stamp payment to the Swarm Foundation owned Uniswap v2 DAI-BZZ pool before sending the remainder to the redistribution lottery." - BZZ stamp is bought on Gnosis, but sent to Ethereum?

This could use refinement from a developer. I am agnostic about whether it happens on Gnosis or the Ethereum main chain.

@tonytony32
Copy link

Insightful writeup. I have a couple of questions :

  • Regarding token supply: If the BC is effectively shutdown, will BZZv2 have a fixed supply?
  • The governance of the UniV2 contract for SF is a bit tricky, in my view. For it to be effectively run by the community, some sort of governance contract must be in place. Is there any example you see that it'd fit properly?

@jpritikin
Copy link
Author

jpritikin commented Mar 5, 2024

* Regarding token supply: If the BC is effectively shutdown, will BZZv2 have a fixed supply?

With the bonding curve shutdown, no additional BZZv1 can be minted. Therefore, the supply of BZZv2 is limited by the number of BZZv1 tokens minted. Moreover, BZZv2 that is sent to the Uniswap LP can be considered burnt. Therefore, the BZZv2 supply becomes deflationary.

* The governance of the UniV2 contract for SF is a bit tricky, in my view.

Why? What kind of governance would be needed? An advantage of UniV2 is that it don't require any active management. The only reason that I think it should be owned by the Swarm Foundation is for emergencies or if the foundation decides to change something in the distant future.

For it to be effectively run by the community, some sort of governance contract must be in place. Is there any example you see that it'd fit properly?

Maker has a governance system, but it is very cumbersome. If at all possible, I'd prefer if we could limit the scope of governance to choices that do not have a big impact and trust the Swarm Foundation to make the decisions.

- Further detail how this SWIP better aligns interests of rational
  investors with the success of the network.
- Add background on the price oracle
- Describe a speculative trading strategy enabled by the bonding curve
  that increase volatility.
- Emphasize that the bonding curve should not be retired until
  there is plenty of market depth to buffer volatility.
- Comment on the function of the BCManager after the bonding curve
  retirement.
- Clarify that the supply of BZZv2 will be deflationary.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants