Remove confusing note about license compatibility #122
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
#18, since I believe what's already in the blueprints is sufficient.
Closed
✅ Deploy Preview for playful-gelato-7892ba ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
I believe this is a tricky situation where all revolves around the very precise phrasing. It is true that we don't want to copy GPL code in our packages because they would then probably have to be released at MIT. We can use GPL packages as dependencies without any issues though. So maybe removing this sentence is indeed safer, even though it is accurate, to avoid confusion. What do you think? |
Bisaloo
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2024
Bisaloo
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…xes #18, since I believe what's already in the blueprints is sufficient.
Not much to add, I guess we shoul've closed this issue a long time ago.