Update human biomolecular data sources page

[lauportell]

Closes #141

[lauportell]

@M-casado to review

[lauportell]

Yesterday we had a meeting to see if we merge the data sources pages for human biomolecular and human clinical health data ant for the moment we will leave them separate and reference them when necessary, as the information they contain right now is different.
We still need to decide where we are going to place the FAIRness page that @M-casado is preparing for human clinical health data as that one will be useful for biomolecular data as well.

[bedroesb]

Writing a FAIRness page, which is not one of the pages we decided to have in IDTk, was a risky thing I think :) This needs more discussing imo!

[M-casado]

Hi @bedroesb, The FAIRness content was reviewed and, albeit a few details, is mostly done.
The issue I created for its addition is #163, but I don't mind whether it becomes a page on its own or rather an addition to an already existing page.

As soon as it is discussed, we can continue with this conversation 👍

[M-casado]

Reviewed the document from GitHub. Besides the smaller comments, I have two overall comments:

• We definitely need to merge the two pages (Merge Human Biomolecular and Clinical data #165), given how everything I read rang a bell with regards to the Human clinical data sources page.
• Wherever it may end at, I would add a mention to the FAIRness page (New FAIRness page #163) whenever speaking about discoverability, access, etc. within this page.

[lauportell]

Hi @IrisVanDam :)
Same for this one.. can you do a final review so we can merge this page?
Thank you!

[IrisVanDam]

The page is really nice and structured clearly. Thanks for all the work on this!
My main concern does not relate to this page specifically, but rather that we might need to discuss (again) exactly what we are aiming to do with the data sources pages. From my understanding the aim was to give the user information on where to find these types of data and how to access them (~secondary use of the data). However, this page seems to be more focused on what to do with your own data as a researcher. I think both approaches are fine, but for the IDTk that we should choose one approach for all pages as to ensure consistency. What do you think?

[lauportell]

Hi @IrisVanDam :)
Arnau did some other changes to resolve your comments - let us know if anything else has to be done.

[IrisVanDam]

I've focused on the new changes made to the page and these look wonderful. I've added a few suggestions, but nothing major :).

[lauportell]

READY TO BE MERGED! :)