I think allowing to create an evaluation in advance is the desired solution here.
This issue is related to #4174

@bmesuere I can't remember if we came up with a good solution for this issue in the setting free solution. We can discus this further in the future

@jorg-vr Did you also consider importing the csv-file with the score items for an exercise from the repository?

• Scenario 1: evaluator is the same as the repository owner
  • Removes the hassle with finding the file for each exercise.
• Scenario 2: evaluator is not the same as the repository owner
  • Evaluator gets a suggestion of how the particular exercise can be evaluated. Evaluator can modify the scores and items as desired. Saves some work and evaluator doesn't have to start from scratch.

Edit: Only allow importing csv-files starting with score_items (or some other predefined text) from the repository.

I did not consider it yet, so thanks for bringing it up. We'll be discussing the feature, and my current implementation, tomorrow. So we can take this into account.

My first thought is that if we do this, it would probably be better for a second iteration.

I'll also have to discuss with teachers how likely they are to reuse scoring rubrics. ie. are these generic enough for the usecase you described in scenario2.

But I'll keep you posted about the results of the discussion with the team.