Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove StaticReflectionService #381

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2024
Merged

Remove StaticReflectionService #381

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2024

Conversation

greg0ire
Copy link
Member

Additionally, implementations of ReflectionService may no longer return null for calls to getClass().

@greg0ire
Remove StaticReflectionService
26288e5 
Additionally, implementations of ReflectionService may no longer return
null for calls to getClass().
@greg0ire
Copy link
Member Author

I am tempted to make ReflectionService a class, and have RuntimeReflectionService extend it and be deprecated in favor of it, or even be removed. Thoughts?

@SenseException
Copy link
Member

Because RuntimeReflectionService is the last class implementing ReflectionService? Is the goal to have just one implementation for a ReflectionService?

@greg0ire
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah, AFAIK it's the sole implementation of ReflectionService, so I'm not sure if there is still a point in having ReflectionService be an interface.

alcaeus
alcaeus approved these changes Jun 24, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@alcaeus alcaeus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Converting ReflectionService to a class is going to be a tough to manage BC break - I don't think it's worth it.

@greg0ire greg0ire merged commit a2a0dae into doctrine:4.0.x Jun 24, 2024
10 checks passed
@greg0ire greg0ire deleted the remove-static-reflection branch June 24, 2024 18:00
@greg0ire greg0ire added this to the 4.0.0 milestone Jun 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@alcaeus alcaeus alcaeus approved these changes

@stof stof Awaiting requested review from stof

@SenseException SenseException Awaiting requested review from SenseException

@derrabus derrabus Awaiting requested review from derrabus

@malarzm malarzm Awaiting requested review from malarzm

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
BC Break
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@greg0ire @SenseException @alcaeus