Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove redundant brackets #16744

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

remove redundant brackets #16744

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

0-v-0
Copy link
Contributor

@0-v-0 0-v-0 commented Jul 22, 2024

No description provided.

@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @0-v-0! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please verify that your PR follows this checklist:

  • My PR is fully covered with tests (you can see the coverage diff by visiting the details link of the codecov check)
  • My PR is as minimal as possible (smaller, focused PRs are easier to review than big ones)
  • I have provided a detailed rationale explaining my changes
  • New or modified functions have Ddoc comments (with Params: and Returns:)

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.


If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment.

Bugzilla references

Your PR doesn't reference any Bugzilla issue.

If your PR contains non-trivial changes, please reference a Bugzilla issue or create a manual changelog.

Testing this PR locally

If you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR:

dub run digger -- build "master + dmd#16744"

@@ -2168,7 +2168,7 @@ void cdcom(ref CGstate cg, ref CodeBuilder cdb,elem *e,regm_t *pretregs)
}
tym_t tym = tybasic(e.Ety);
int sz = _tysize[tym];
uint rex = (I64 && sz == 8) ? REX_W : 0;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is not more easy to read as a result of this change

@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ bool expressionsToString(ref OutBuffer buf, Scope* sc, Expressions* exps)
// char literals exp `.toStringExp` return `null` but we cant override it
// because in most contexts we don't want the conversion to succeed.
IntegerExp ie = e4.isIntegerExp();
const ty = (ie && ie.type) ? ie.type.ty : Terror;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto

Comment on lines -18 to -20
@nogc:
nothrow:
pure:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please leave this as is

Copy link
Contributor

@RazvanN7 RazvanN7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not the kind of change that we accept, mainly because it does not bring a net benefit. This sort of change is quite subjective and it can be argued both ways so instead of entering in meaningless debates we go down the conservative route and flat out reject cosmetic changes to the code.

@0-v-0 0-v-0 closed this Jul 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants