Bot Tags #1147
Bot Tags #1147
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent update brings a more structured approach to tagging within the system, introducing a new Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- kairon/shared/account/data_objects.py (2 hunks)
- kairon/shared/data/constant.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
kairon/shared/account/data_objects.py (2)
- 19-19: The import of
TagTypefromkairon.shared.data.constantis correctly added to support the new tagging functionality. This import is necessary for theTaggingclass to useTagTypein its type field.- 87-87: The addition of the
tagsfield in theBotclass as aListFieldofEmbeddedDocumentFieldforTaggingis correctly implemented. This allows for associating multiple tags with a bot, aligning with the objectives of the PR to enhance the bot's functionality through a tagging system.kairon/shared/data/constant.py (1)
- 235-237: The addition of the
TagTypeenum withADMINandUSERvalues is correctly implemented. This enum provides a clear and restricted set of tag types that can be used throughout the system, ensuring consistency and facilitating access control or differentiation in tag usage.
| class Tagging(EmbeddedDocument): | ||
| tag = StringField() | ||
| type = StringField(choices=[TagType.ADMIN.value, TagType.USER.value], default=None) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The Tagging embedded document class is well-defined with a tag field as a StringField and a type field that uses the TagType enum for its choices. This design ensures that the tag type is restricted to the predefined ADMIN and USER values, enhancing data integrity. However, consider setting a required=True constraint on the tag field to ensure that every tag has a name.
- tag = StringField()
+ tag = StringField(required=True)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| class Tagging(EmbeddedDocument): | |
| tag = StringField() | |
| type = StringField(choices=[TagType.ADMIN.value, TagType.USER.value], default=None) | |
| class Tagging(EmbeddedDocument): | |
| tag = StringField(required=True) | |
| type = StringField(choices=[TagType.ADMIN.value, TagType.USER.value], default=None) |
| class Tags(Auditlog): | ||
| tags = EmbeddedDocumentField(Tagging, default=None) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The modification of the Tags class to include a list of Tagging embedded documents is a significant change. However, there seems to be a misunderstanding in the implementation. The tags field is defined as an EmbeddedDocumentField instead of a ListField of EmbeddedDocumentField. This needs to be corrected to accurately represent a list of tags.
- tags = EmbeddedDocumentField(Tagging, default=None)
+ tags = ListField(EmbeddedDocumentField(Tagging))Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| class Tags(Auditlog): | |
| tags = EmbeddedDocumentField(Tagging, default=None) | |
| class Tags(Auditlog): | |
| tags = ListField(EmbeddedDocumentField(Tagging)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/integration_test/chat_service_test.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
tests/integration_test/chat_service_test.py (1)
- 1636-1636: The addition of
responses.reset()before making a POST request in the test function is a good practice. It ensures that any previous mock responses are cleared, preventing potential side effects from affecting the current test. This contributes to more reliable and isolated test cases.
Added tags in bot.
Summary by CodeRabbit
ADMINandUSERtags for better organization and management.