Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(cvi): use condition builder as condition api in cvi controller #493

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

eofff
Copy link
Contributor

@eofff eofff commented Oct 31, 2024

Description

Use condition builder as condition api in cvi controller.

Why do we need it, and what problem does it solve?

What is the expected result?

Checklist

  • The code is covered by unit tests.
  • e2e tests passed.
  • Documentation updated according to the changes.
  • Changes were tested in the Kubernetes cluster manually.

Signed-off-by: Valeriy Khorunzhin <[email protected]>
@eofff eofff requested a review from Isteb4k November 6, 2024 15:27
fix
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Khorunzhin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Khorunzhin <[email protected]>
@eofff eofff requested a review from Isteb4k November 7, 2024 08:51
yaroslavborbat
yaroslavborbat previously approved these changes Nov 7, 2024
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Khorunzhin <[email protected]>
Valeriy Khorunzhin added 3 commits November 7, 2024 12:28
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Khorunzhin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Khorunzhin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Khorunzhin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Khorunzhin <[email protected]>
@eofff eofff force-pushed the refactor/cvi/use-condition-builder-as-condition-api branch from b101785 to 549feed Compare November 7, 2024 14:23
@eofff eofff merged commit 1cc1a92 into main Nov 7, 2024
12 checks passed
@eofff eofff deleted the refactor/cvi/use-condition-builder-as-condition-api branch November 7, 2024 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants