-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Encourage the use of root_path in production to ensure single deployment #1712
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Encourage the use of root_path in production to ensure single deployment #1712
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Pieter Noordhuis <[email protected]>
// Clear targets after loading. | ||
b.Config.Targets = nil | ||
b.Config.Environments = nil | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of keeping these around here, could you break out a field on the bundle struct where we can keep a snapshot of the selected target? Then you can interrogate it and there's no risk of other mutators changing it after selection. The targets in the configuration have no significance beyond this point.
E.g.
// Target stores a snapshot of the target configuration when it was selected.
Target *config.Target
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't it cleaner to just remove the side effect from select_target
? Instead of just recording which target is selected, the mutator removes fields, which is a bit hard to discover and not really motivated in the code. It's a bit surprising if you want to build a new mutator that consumes this value. Based on your comments, the motivation is to clean things up in order for consumption by summary/validate; shouldn't we just make that a separate step?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I see as a risk is that keeping them around means another location that new mutators can go and look at, even though everything under targets no longer has any effect. Variable interpolation won't run either, so values under it shouldn't be used.
I see how this is most convenient though. @andrewnester What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's just that over the past year I ran into this problem twice. You need to use a step through debugger to find where this property is secretly deleted. And the code that deletes it includes no rationale and is just meant to select the default target.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alright, I don't want to leave this PR open just because we can't make a decision here. I added 6ea5306 which merges the cleanup behavior back into SelectTarget and adds a few comments about the behavior for maintainers.
742210c
to
3973c50
Compare
3973c50
to
6ea5306
Compare
@pietern @andrewnester could you take another look at this PR? The remaining thread should be resolved: #1712 (comment) |
bundle/config/bundle.go
Outdated
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ type Bundle struct { | |||
// Target is set by the mutator that selects the target. | |||
Target string `json:"target,omitempty" bundle:"readonly"` | |||
|
|||
// TargetConfig stores a snapshot of the target configuration when it was selected by SelectTarget. | |||
TargetConfig *Target `json:"target_config,omitempty" bundle:"internal"` | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If located here, it is a part of the configuration, therefore the schema, the output of validate, etc.
Please move this to be a property on the bundle.Bundle
type to avoid this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Ah, yes, you're right. I moved it.
Do you still think it's the right balance to have that extra property there. It's an extra field that copies the bundle config but it only has a value depending on which state the deployment is in. I'm okay with the proposed approach but it seems cleaner to me to have fewer properties and to do a cleanup step just before summary/validate.
If integration tests don't run automatically, an authorized user can run them manually by following the instructions below: Trigger: Inputs:
Checks will be approved automatically on success. |
Changes
This updates
mode: production
to allowroot_path
to indicate uniqueness. Historically, we requiredrun_as
for this, which isn't actually very effective for that purpose.run_as
also had the problem that it doesn't work for pipelines.This is a cherry-pick from #1387