Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #13202 FP oppositeInnerCondition for string defines #6889
Fix #13202 FP oppositeInnerCondition for string defines #6889
Changes from all commits
2e021ba
b870997
a6091fc
cf09149
d3912a9
40dee7d
d2dd56a
b344dd5
4b92242
b31820e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure what macroName there will be if there are nested macros. Can you try this:
I think that ideally we don't warn about that because Y could possibly have different definitions..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it strikes me that it might be within reach to identify if a macro can have different possible values in different configurations.. if the code is something like:
I think it would not be impossible to mark "X" as a macro that has different values using the info from simplecpp that I think is available. But the info must be propagated to the checkers somehow..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We also don't know if a macro was a simple define or a functional-style macro, which should be handled differently (see the failing test in windows.cpp).