Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed #10760 - added file name to ValueFlow --debug output #5655

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2023

Conversation

firewave
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@firewave firewave changed the title fixed #10760 - added file name to ValueFlow --debug output [skip ci] fixed #10760 - added file name to ValueFlow --debug output Nov 13, 2023
@firewave
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Please don't ask me why I didn't use the actual example code from the ticket which is simpler.



##file {}
2: void f2 ( )
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not part of this PR but I am curious why we commit the empty leading lines for the first file but not the others.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No particular reason I think. I think it's ok to leave out the empty leading lines for all files.

@firewave firewave merged commit 682901a into danmar:main Nov 16, 2023
68 checks passed
@firewave firewave deleted the vf-dbg-file branch November 16, 2023 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants