-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Nat router #10
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix: Nat router #10
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -23,3 +23,15 @@ resource "google_service_networking_connection" "this" { | |
service = "servicenetworking.googleapis.com" | ||
reserved_peering_ranges = [google_compute_global_address.this.name] | ||
} | ||
|
||
resource "google_compute_router" "this" { | ||
name = "${var.namespace}-router" | ||
network = google_compute_network.this.id | ||
} | ||
|
||
resource "google_compute_router_nat" "this" { | ||
name = "${var.namespace}-nat" | ||
router = google_compute_router.this.name | ||
nat_ip_allocate_option = "AUTO_ONLY" | ||
source_subnetwork_ip_ranges_to_nat = "ALL_SUBNETWORKS_ALL_IP_RANGES" | ||
} | ||
Comment on lines
+26
to
+37
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 💡 Codebase verification Missing firewall rules could impact network security and functionality The verification confirms that the networking module lacks any firewall rules configuration. This is a significant security consideration as:
Required actions:
🔗 Analysis chainVerify firewall rules for the NAT setup. The NAT configuration looks good, but ensure that appropriate firewall rules exist to:
Let me check the content of the found file to see if it contains any relevant network configuration or TODOs. Let me check if there are any other Terraform files in the networking module that might contain firewall rules. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check for existing firewall rules in the Terraform configs
rg -l "google_compute_firewall" .
# Look for any network-related TODO comments
rg -l "TODO.*network|firewall|egress|ingress" .
Length of output: 114 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check content of the found file
cat ./modules/helm_release/main.tf
# Let's also check for any firewall-related resources or configurations in the networking module
cat ./modules/networking/main.tf
Length of output: 4934 Script: #!/bin/bash
# List all terraform files in the networking module
ls -la ./modules/networking/
# Check for firewall rules in any variables or outputs files
cat ./modules/networking/variables.tf 2>/dev/null
cat ./modules/networking/outputs.tf 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 898 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance NAT configuration with security and performance settings.
The current NAT configuration uses the most permissive settings which might not be optimal for production:
ALL_SUBNETWORKS_ALL_IP_RANGES
if not all instances need internet access📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this will work as the pod ip's are 10.32.x.x
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@zacharyblasczyk, understood. Thank you for pointing that out—the pod IPs being in the 10.32.x.x range means the suggested NAT configuration changes may not be appropriate here. Please disregard my earlier suggestion.