Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: release metadata in the v1/openapi.ts #271

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zacharyblasczyk
Copy link
Member

@zacharyblasczyk zacharyblasczyk commented Dec 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a metadata property to the Release and Resource schemas, allowing for additional information.
    • Introduced new endpoints for deleting release channels and environments, as well as retrieving systems and resources.
  • Updated Features

    • Standardized the metadata property across request and response schemas for the /v1/releases endpoint.
    • Enhanced the GET method for resources to include additional properties in the response.
    • Updated the PATCH method for job agents to include a request body schema.
  • Security Enhancements

    • Added security requirements for certain endpoints to ensure protected operations.
  • Improvements

    • Refined response descriptions and schemas for clarity, including success properties for delete operations.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new metadata property to the Release and Resource schemas across multiple components of the application. The changes span the OpenAPI specification, Node SDK, and GitHub integration, allowing additional object-based metadata to be associated with releases. The modifications ensure consistent schema definition and enable more flexible metadata handling across different parts of the system.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/openapi.ts Added metadata property to Release schema and Resource schema as an object with additional properties; metadata made required in Resource.
apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/releases/openapi.ts Updated metadata to reference the main Release schema definition in request and response bodies of POST /v1/releases.
integrations/github-get-job-inputs/src/index.ts Added setOutputsRecursively call for release_metadata.
openapi.v1.json Comprehensive OpenAPI specification updates, including new endpoints for deleting release channels and environments, retrieving systems and resources, and schema modifications.
packages/node-sdk/src/schema.ts Added optional metadata property to Release schema and updated createRelease operation to reference the new metadata structure.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant ReleaseService
    participant StorageSystem

    Client->>ReleaseService: Create Release with Metadata
    ReleaseService->>StorageSystem: Store Release
    StorageSystem-->>ReleaseService: Confirm Storage
    ReleaseService-->>Client: Return Release with Metadata
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Metadata

In schemas deep and APIs bright,
Metadata dances with pure delight.
Strings of wisdom, flexible and free,
Releases now speak more eloquently.
Hop, hop, hooray for context clear! 🎉

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
integrations/github-get-job-inputs/src/index.ts (1)

81-81: LGTM! Metadata handling is consistent with existing patterns.

The implementation correctly uses setOutputsRecursively for release metadata, following the same pattern as other metadata fields.

Consider adding tests to verify the handling of release metadata in the outputs, similar to other metadata fields.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b917efc and 298e874.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/openapi.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/releases/openapi.ts (2 hunks)
  • integrations/github-get-job-inputs/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • openapi.v1.json (3 hunks)
  • packages/node-sdk/src/schema.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
integrations/github-get-job-inputs/src/index.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.

apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/openapi.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.

apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/releases/openapi.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.

packages/node-sdk/src/schema.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.

🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/openapi.ts (1)

48-51: LGTM! The metadata property implementation is consistent.

The metadata property implementation follows the same pattern as other metadata fields in the codebase (e.g., Resource schema) and correctly defines it as an optional object with string values.

Let's verify the consistency of metadata implementation across schemas:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can see that the metadata implementation across the codebase consistently follows the pattern of an object with string values. This is evident in multiple places:

  1. OpenAPI specs in various routes:
metadata: {
  type: "object",
  additionalProperties: { type: "string" },
}
  1. Node SDK schema definitions:
metadata?: {
  [key: string]: string;
};
  1. Validators:
metadata: z.record(z.string())

The implementation in the review file matches this pattern exactly:

metadata: {
  type: "object",
  additionalProperties: { type: "string" },
}

LGTM! The metadata implementation is consistent with the codebase standards

The metadata property implementation in the OpenAPI spec follows the established pattern used throughout the codebase, defining it as an object with string key-value pairs.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent metadata implementation across schemas
# Look for any other metadata fields in the codebase to ensure consistency

rg -U "metadata.*\{[\s\S]*?\}" --type ts

Length of output: 28205

apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/releases/openapi.ts (2)

27-27: LGTM! Correct usage of schema reference.

The metadata property correctly references the base Release schema, ensuring consistency in the API specification.


46-46: LGTM! Response schema is consistent with request schema.

The response schema correctly uses the same metadata reference as the request schema.

packages/node-sdk/src/schema.ts (2)

385-387: LGTM: Well-structured metadata property definition

The metadata property is properly defined as an optional object with string key-value pairs, following OpenAPI best practices.


1255-1255: LGTM: Consistent schema reference usage

Good use of schema references for the metadata property in both request and response. This promotes consistency and follows the DRY principle.

Also applies to: 1269-1269

openapi.v1.json (2)

2354-2358: LGTM: Well-defined metadata schema

The metadata property is properly defined in the Release schema with consistent type definitions.


1344-1344: LGTM: Proper schema references in the releases endpoint

Good use of schema references for the metadata property in both request and response bodies of the /v1/releases endpoint.

Also applies to: 1370-1370

openapi.v1.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/openapi.ts (1)

48-48: Consider restricting metadata values to strings

The metadata property implementation with additionalProperties: true allows any type of value. For consistency and type safety, consider restricting values to strings, similar to other metadata implementations in the codebase.

-          metadata: { type: "object", additionalProperties: true },
+          metadata: { type: "object", additionalProperties: { type: "string" } },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 298e874 and 74957cf.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/openapi.ts (1 hunks)
  • openapi.v1.json (3 hunks)
  • packages/node-sdk/src/schema.ts (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/node-sdk/src/schema.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/webservice/src/app/api/v1/openapi.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
openapi.v1.json (2)

2353-2356: Consider restricting metadata values to strings

Similar to the previous comment, the metadata property implementation with additionalProperties: true allows any type of value. For consistency and type safety across the API, consider restricting values to strings.

-          "metadata": {
-            "type": "object",
-            "additionalProperties": true
-          }
+          "metadata": {
+            "type": "object",
+            "additionalProperties": {
+              "type": "string"
+            }
+          }

1344-1344: LGTM! Well-structured schema references

The metadata property is correctly referenced using $ref in both request and response schemas, maintaining consistency and reusability.

Also applies to: 1370-1370

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant