Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The VolumeGroup specification contains a few minor mistakes #71

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 5, 2024

Conversation

nixpanic
Copy link
Contributor

  • volumegroup: description should mention MODIFY_VOLUME_GROUP
  • volumegroup: correct comment got the ControllerGetVolumeGroup RPC call

@nixpanic nixpanic changed the title volumegroup/corrections The VolumeGroup specification contains a few minor mistakes Jul 25, 2024
@mergify mergify bot added the design Adds or updates an operation or service label Jul 25, 2024
@iPraveenParihar
Copy link
Member

@Mergifyio refresh

Copy link

mergify bot commented Aug 5, 2024

refresh

❌ Command disallowed due to command restrictions in the Mergify configuration.

  • any of:
    • sender-permission>=write
    • sender={{author}}

@nixpanic
Copy link
Contributor Author

nixpanic commented Aug 5, 2024

@Mergifyio refresh

Copy link

mergify bot commented Aug 5, 2024

refresh

✅ Pull request refreshed

The ModifyVolumeGroupMembership procedure description refers to the
MODIFY_VOLUME_GROUP_MEMBERSHIP capability, but that does not exist. The
capability that is available in the IdentityService is
MODIFY_VOLUME_GROUP.

Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <[email protected]>
The comment mentions CreateVolumeGroup, which should be
ControllerGetVolumeGroup.

Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <[email protected]>
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 77331fc into csi-addons:main Aug 5, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
design Adds or updates an operation or service
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants