cve-2024-6387: much faster leakspeed and higher capacity

[blotus]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Hello @blotus,

Scenarios/AppSec Rule are compliant with the taxonomy, thank you for your contribution!

[github-actions]

Hello @blotus,

Scenarios/AppSec Rule are compliant with the taxonomy, thank you for your contribution!

[github-actions]

Hello @AlteredCoder,

✅ The new VPATCH Rule is compliant, thank you for your contribution!

[github-actions]

Hello @AlteredCoder,

Scenarios/AppSec Rule are compliant with the taxonomy, thank you for your contribution!

[github-actions]

Hello @blotus,

Scenarios/AppSec Rule are compliant with the taxonomy, thank you for your contribution!

[github-actions]

Hello @buixor and thank you for your contribution!

❗ It seems that the following scenarios are not part of the 'crowdsecurity/appsec-virtual-patching' collection:

🔴 crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2023-4634 🔴
🔴 crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2024-1071 🔴
🔴 crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2023-0600 🔴
🔴 crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2023-6623 🔴
🔴 crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2023-23489 🔴
🔴 crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2023-2009 🔴
🔴 crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2023-0900 🔴
🔴 crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2023-23488 🔴
🔴 crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2023-6360 🔴
🔴 crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2024-1061 🔴
🔴 crowdsecurity/vpatch-CVE-2023-6567 🔴

[github-actions]

Hello @buixor,

Scenarios/AppSec Rule are compliant with the taxonomy, thank you for your contribution!