Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Script updating archive at 2024-09-19T00:46:19Z. [ci skip]
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
ID Bot committed Sep 19, 2024
1 parent d8dc6f9 commit 55a1141
Showing 1 changed file with 26 additions and 13 deletions.
39 changes: 26 additions & 13 deletions archive.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"magic": "E!vIA5L86J2I",
"timestamp": "2024-09-17T00:37:42.255940+00:00",
"timestamp": "2024-09-19T00:46:11.599644+00:00",
"repo": "cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs",
"labels": [
{
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -52,6 +52,11 @@
"name": "wglc-blocker",
"description": "",
"color": "EC1D5D"
},
{
"name": "ready-for-pr",
"description": "",
"color": "0E8A16"
}
],
"issues": [
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -148,7 +153,8 @@
"author": "OR13",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"assignees": [
"OR13"
"OR13",
"henkbirkholz"
],
"labels": [
"wglc-blocker"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -293,17 +299,17 @@
"id": "I_kwDOKPwz586SPXWc",
"title": "Detached Payload in Consistency Proofs",
"url": "https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-merkle-tree-proofs/issues/30",
"state": "OPEN",
"state": "CLOSED",
"author": "OR13",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"assignees": [
"robinbryce"
"assignees": [],
"labels": [
"ready-for-pr"
],
"labels": [],
"body": "https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/Jr10No1nSA35PxhBzYmx49oYuuY/\r\n\r\nSome discussion on the list suggests that both inclusion and consistency proofs should have detached payloads.",
"createdAt": "2024-08-07T13:33:41Z",
"updatedAt": "2024-09-10T14:31:24Z",
"closedAt": null,
"updatedAt": "2024-09-17T14:49:12Z",
"closedAt": "2024-09-17T14:47:32Z",
"comments": [
{
"author": "OR13",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -335,10 +341,17 @@
},
{
"author": "ad-l",
"authorAssociation": "NONE",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"body": "We discussed this on the editor call and we think that it is not really an issue that for the RFC9162 algorithm the inclusion proof has detached signature whereas consistency proofs have attached signatures, as for consistency you need an explicit comparison point (that you can't locally recompute), whereas inclusion proofs we explicitly want the verifier to recompute.\r\n\r\nHowever, there is one change we could do to clarify the requirements around this. Currently, we explain why all inclusion proofs should use detached payloads in 5.2, even though we don't say this requirement applies to all VDS, not just RFC9162_SHA256. So we should clarify this, and also say (possibly in 5.3) that consistency proofs may or may not use detached payloads, depending on the VDS.",
"createdAt": "2024-09-10T14:31:23Z",
"updatedAt": "2024-09-10T14:31:23Z"
},
{
"author": "SteveLasker",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"body": "Editor's call note: For RFC9162 consistency proofs, we should have an attached payload, which is the new merkletree head, for this particular format.",
"createdAt": "2024-09-17T14:39:40Z",
"updatedAt": "2024-09-17T14:39:40Z"
}
]
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -822,7 +835,7 @@
"abbreviatedOid": "bd1c95a"
},
"author": "fournet",
"authorAssociation": "CONTRIBUTOR",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"state": "COMMENTED",
"body": "",
"createdAt": "2024-02-27T15:33:43Z",
Expand All @@ -842,7 +855,7 @@
"abbreviatedOid": "bd1c95a"
},
"author": "fournet",
"authorAssociation": "CONTRIBUTOR",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"state": "COMMENTED",
"body": "",
"createdAt": "2024-02-27T15:35:39Z",
Expand All @@ -862,7 +875,7 @@
"abbreviatedOid": "bd1c95a"
},
"author": "ad-l",
"authorAssociation": "NONE",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"state": "APPROVED",
"body": "",
"createdAt": "2024-02-27T15:38:08Z",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -989,7 +1002,7 @@
"comments": [
{
"author": "ad-l",
"authorAssociation": "NONE",
"authorAssociation": "COLLABORATOR",
"body": "Looking good, thanks",
"createdAt": "2024-04-08T18:32:13Z",
"updatedAt": "2024-04-08T18:32:13Z"
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 55a1141

Please sign in to comment.