Why the dependence on BenchmarkTools?

[gdalle]

I looked for @b in the package and it only shows up in benchmarking or testing. Any reason to keep BenchmarkTools in the package's dependencies?

[gdalle]

Presumably the same goes for the Profile stdlib

[willtebbutt]

Good catch, must be an oversight on my part. Will deal with this at some point 👍

[willtebbutt]

Presumably the same goes for the Profile stdlib

Where abouts in the code did you find the Profile stdlib dep? I can't seem to find it in the code.

[gdalle]

Adding Tapir to my test environment back when it wasn't registered happened after instantiation, and so I saw all the packages that were added to the manifest. The ones that struck me as out of place were Profile and BenchmarkTools, but maybe Profile was an indirect dependency (eg of BenchmarkTools), I didn't double-check.

[willtebbutt]

Cool -- yeah, I think you're correct re Profile being an indirect dep of Tapir. Thanks for confirming.

[willtebbutt]

Resolved by #108 . Thanks for catching this @gdalle