- Governance votes (C4IP 7+)
- Governance votes from prior contract (C4IP 1-6 prior to contract upgrade) — Note: awaiting a fix from Tally on this info being indexed on their site
- Governance discussion / community forum
- Rulebook issues
- Organizational Outcomes
Code4rena is an interdependent community of people doing highly subjective work in a greenfield industry.
In order to facilitate consensus building, this repository contains the mechanism, rules, and best current practices of Code4rena contests:
- Best Current Practices are community-driven discussions intended to provide guidance for sponsors, judges, and wardens. You can find discussions of best current practices in open rules issues.
- Mechanism represents the fundamentals of how audit contests work and how awards are distributed. (minimal currently)
- Rules support the mechanism with nuance applied in subjective scenarios as interpreted by judges (NOT STARTED YET)
Pasted from this chat thread introducing this repo to provide some context in the absence of any documentation for this repo yet :)
+1 to it being super helpful for wardens to help identify which things from past contests seem like they may be outliers.
Can we ask everyone to file issues on this repo for each case that stands out as a deviation or a place where the rule seems inconsistently applied?
We are intending to develop as the single source of truth for which things are hard and fast rules vs more subjective and still developing.
One absolute requirement: let’s make sure issues are filed as neutrally worded inquiries rather than that turning into a public complaint field about how your own submissions were judged. (There is no code of conduct in the repo yet, but this will be there when we get a chance.)
Tip: If you feel strong emotion as you’re filing an issue, it would be wise to take a step back for a bit and then come back later and try to submit your issue as a neutral scientific examination. Creating this rulebook will be a collaborative effort between all members of the community, and eventually we will have clear processes created and documented for how changes are proposed and made.
Right now we’re bootstrapping it, so please feel free to contribute however you see best and we’ll start to work to sort the chaos out as a community. The structure is not set in stone either; do feel free to make suggestions for how it could be improved
