Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Life cycle #525

Open
rdiwan2023 opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Life cycle #525

rdiwan2023 opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@rdiwan2023
Copy link

Hi Caliptra team,

Do you have any test for different life cycle inputs?

Lower 2 bits are mapped to device lifecycle (unprovisioned, manufacturing, production)

Thanks
Rohith

@dbids
Copy link

dbids commented May 29, 2024

Note the following inconsistency as well: chipsalliance/Caliptra#190

@Nitsirks
Copy link
Contributor

Nitsirks commented Jun 7, 2024

Our uvm bench for soc_ifc randomly set the lifecycle bits each test where they get stored in the CPTRA_SECURITY_STATE register.

I would need to check with the team that did JTAG testing to see if they tested JTAG enabling through lifecycle bits. None of our other content exercises this interface.

The spec inconsistency will be addressed soon also.

@bharatpillilli bharatpillilli added the question Further information is requested label Jun 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants