Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add BRAM numbers to resource estimate executive summary #2360

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

polybeandip
Copy link
Collaborator

@polybeandip polybeandip commented Nov 20, 2024

Closes #2288

I've checked that this grabs the correct values. Say our main_utilization_placed.rpt file had the following BRAM table

nine
(not a real utilization file, I changed the highlighted entry from 0 to 9 to make sure I'm grabbing the correct value)

Running fud e --from synth-files --to resource-estimate report yields the correct BRAM count of 9:

{
  "lut": 169,
  "dsp": 0,
  "brams": 9,
  "registers": 60,
  "muxes": 30,
  "clb_registers": 210,
  "carry8": 10,
  "f7_muxes": 0,
  "f8_muxes": 0,
  "f9_muxes": 0,
  "clb": 389,
  "meet_timing": 1,
  "worst_slack": 4.758,
  "period": 7.0,
  "frequency": 142.857,
  "uram": -1,
  "cell_lut1": 5,
  "cell_lut2": 110,
  "cell_lut3": 38,
  "cell_lut4": 17,
  "cell_lut5": 18,
  "cell_lut6": 49,
  "cell_fdre": 210
}

@rachitnigam
Copy link
Contributor

Let's merge #2356 first which is a more substantial rework of the extraction logic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Resource estimate executive summary lacks BRAM numbers
2 participants