-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP Always include BMC expenditures #216
Open
tdooner
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
include-ballot-measure-expenditures-always
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I'm not sure about this method. There are a lot of BMC (ballot measure committees) that don't support ballot measures. (?) Curious what the diff will look like on this one. When calculating referendum supporters (using the Measure_Expenditures view), we included: 1. E-Expenditures from committees who reported a "Bal_Name" that was on the "name_to_number" sheet. 2. 496 independent expenditures as determined by the "Bal_Name" matching the "name_to_number" sheet. 3. E-Expenditures from committees using "name_to_number" to match when "Bal_Name" is null. ...but we seemingly do not include expenditures from ballot measure committees. We link it up in the spreadsheet, so I think we can just assume that any expenditures from BMC's are for the purpose of their associated ballot measure.
tdooner
force-pushed
the
include-ballot-measure-expenditures-always
branch
from
April 9, 2020 06:03
cbdb26c
to
a8dc333
Compare
Build diff from Commit a8dc333:diff --git a/build/_data/referendum_opposing/oakland/2018-11-06/oakland-children-s-initiative.json b/build/_data/referendum_opposing/oakland/2018-11-06/oakland-children-s-initiative.json
index 1c29006..64043ac 100644
--- a/build/_data/referendum_opposing/oakland/2018-11-06/oakland-children-s-initiative.json
+++ b/build/_data/referendum_opposing/oakland/2018-11-06/oakland-children-s-initiative.json
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
"id": "1410941",
"name": "Committee for Better Choices, No on Measure AA, Y and W",
"payee": "Committee for Better Choices, No on Measure AA, Y and W",
- "amount": 306326.17
+ "amount": 916011.83
}
],
"total_contributions": 305973.58999999997
diff --git a/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2016-11-08/oakland-school-bond.json b/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2016-11-08/oakland-school-bond.json
index 2d759f4..9725e16 100644
--- a/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2016-11-08/oakland-school-bond.json
+++ b/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2016-11-08/oakland-school-bond.json
@@ -35,13 +35,13 @@
"id": "960997",
"name": "Friends of Oakland Public Schools",
"payee": "Friends of Oakland Public Schools",
- "amount": 96766.73
+ "amount": 394570.34
},
{
"id": "1391632",
"name": "YES ON G1, SPONSORED BY GO PUBLIC SCHOOLS ADVOCATES",
"payee": "YES ON G1, SPONSORED BY GO PUBLIC SCHOOLS ADVOCATES",
- "amount": 15018.45
+ "amount": 15147.38
}
],
"total_contributions": 282500.0
diff --git a/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2016-11-08/sugar-sweetened-beverage-tax.json b/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2016-11-08/sugar-sweetened-beverage-tax.json
index 09b32a0..eeb8c6e 100644
--- a/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2016-11-08/sugar-sweetened-beverage-tax.json
+++ b/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2016-11-08/sugar-sweetened-beverage-tax.json
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
"id": "1381041",
"name": "Yes on Measure HH, Citizens for Healthy Oakland Children",
"payee": "Yes on Measure HH, Citizens for Healthy Oakland Children",
- "amount": 10770118.52
+ "amount": 10765358.3
}
],
"total_contributions": 10759941.92
diff --git a/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-06-05/library-parcel-tax.json b/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-06-05/library-parcel-tax.json
index 997fdf6..4c52d95 100644
--- a/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-06-05/library-parcel-tax.json
+++ b/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-06-05/library-parcel-tax.json
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
"id": "1400467",
"name": "Protect Oakland Libraries - Yes on D 2018",
"payee": "Protect Oakland Libraries - Yes on D 2018",
- "amount": 155810.1
+ "amount": 155397.5
}
],
"total_contributions": 151587.72
diff --git a/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-11-06/just-cause-eviction-amendments.json b/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-11-06/just-cause-eviction-amendments.json
index 9201cea..84f68c2 100644
--- a/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-11-06/just-cause-eviction-amendments.json
+++ b/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-11-06/just-cause-eviction-amendments.json
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
"id": "1413440",
"name": "Protect Oakland Renters, Yes on Measure Y. Sponsored by CommunityOrganizations",
"payee": "Protect Oakland Renters, Yes on Measure Y. Sponsored by CommunityOrganizations",
- "amount": 7453.12
+ "amount": 43322.81
}
],
"total_contributions": 39410.8
diff --git a/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-11-06/oakland-children-s-initiative.json b/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-11-06/oakland-children-s-initiative.json
index de37fc8..16ee7c2 100644
--- a/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-11-06/oakland-children-s-initiative.json
+++ b/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-11-06/oakland-children-s-initiative.json
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
"id": "1310647",
"name": "The Oakland Fund",
"payee": "The Oakland Fund",
- "amount": 1881647.43
+ "amount": 2261752.08
}
],
"total_contributions": 1830511.6
diff --git a/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-11-06/tiered-real-property-transfer-tax.json b/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-11-06/tiered-real-property-transfer-tax.json
index cf763da..11a772b 100644
--- a/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-11-06/tiered-real-property-transfer-tax.json
+++ b/build/_data/referendum_supporting/oakland/2018-11-06/tiered-real-property-transfer-tax.json
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
"id": "1412582",
"name": "Oaklanders for Fair Taxation & Improved City Services, a Kalb Ballot Measure Committee in Favor of Measure",
"payee": "Oaklanders for Fair Taxation & Improved City Services, a Kalb Ballot Measure Committee in Favor of Measure",
- "amount": 2969.0
+ "amount": 29701.81
}
],
"total_contributions": 29700.0 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm not sure about this method. There are a lot of BMC (ballot measure
committees) that don't support ballot measures. (?) Curious what the
diff will look like on this one.
When calculating referendum supporters (using the Measure_Expenditures
view), we included:
the "name_to_number" sheet.
the "name_to_number" sheet.
"Bal_Name" is null.
...but we seemingly do not include expenditures from ballot measure
committees. We link it up in the spreadsheet, so I think we can just
assume that any expenditures from BMC's are for the purpose of their
associated ballot measure.