Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
fix: add ProofOp verifier to enhancement the check
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
unclezoro committed Oct 8, 2022
1 parent b7a42b5 commit 6fa739f
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 31 additions and 9 deletions.
26 changes: 17 additions & 9 deletions crypto/merkle/proof.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -30,17 +30,25 @@ type ProofOperator interface {
// and the last Merkle root will be verified with already known data
type ProofOperators []ProofOperator

func (poz ProofOperators) VerifyValue(root []byte, keypath string, value []byte) (err error) {
return poz.Verify(root, keypath, [][]byte{value})
type ProofOpVerifier func(ProofOperator) error

func (poz ProofOperators) VerifyValue(root []byte, keypath string, value []byte, verifiers ...ProofOpVerifier) (err error) {
return poz.Verify(root, keypath, [][]byte{value}, verifiers...)
}

func (poz ProofOperators) Verify(root []byte, keypath string, args [][]byte) (err error) {
func (poz ProofOperators) Verify(root []byte, keypath string, args [][]byte, verifiers ...ProofOpVerifier) (err error) {
keys, err := KeyPathToKeys(keypath)
if err != nil {
return
}

for i, op := range poz {
for _, verifier := range verifiers {
if err := verifier(op); err != nil {
return err
}
}

key := op.GetKey()
if len(key) != 0 {
if len(keys) == 0 {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -109,22 +117,22 @@ func (prt *ProofRuntime) DecodeProof(proof *Proof) (ProofOperators, error) {
return poz, nil
}

func (prt *ProofRuntime) VerifyValue(proof *Proof, root []byte, keypath string, value []byte) (err error) {
return prt.Verify(proof, root, keypath, [][]byte{value})
func (prt *ProofRuntime) VerifyValue(proof *Proof, root []byte, keypath string, value []byte, verifiers ...ProofOpVerifier) (err error) {
return prt.Verify(proof, root, keypath, [][]byte{value}, verifiers...)
}

// TODO In the long run we'll need a method of classifcation of ops,
// whether existence or absence or perhaps a third?
func (prt *ProofRuntime) VerifyAbsence(proof *Proof, root []byte, keypath string) (err error) {
return prt.Verify(proof, root, keypath, nil)
func (prt *ProofRuntime) VerifyAbsence(proof *Proof, root []byte, keypath string, verifiers ...ProofOpVerifier) (err error) {
return prt.Verify(proof, root, keypath, nil, verifiers...)
}

func (prt *ProofRuntime) Verify(proof *Proof, root []byte, keypath string, args [][]byte) (err error) {
func (prt *ProofRuntime) Verify(proof *Proof, root []byte, keypath string, args [][]byte, verifiers ...ProofOpVerifier) (err error) {
poz, err := prt.DecodeProof(proof)
if err != nil {
return cmn.ErrorWrap(err, "decoding proof")
}
return poz.Verify(root, keypath, args)
return poz.Verify(root, keypath, args, verifiers...)
}

// DefaultProofRuntime only knows about Simple value
Expand Down
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions crypto/merkle/proof_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
package merkle

import (
"fmt"
"testing"

"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -134,6 +135,19 @@ func TestProofOperators(t *testing.T) {
popz = []ProofOperator{}
err = popz.Verify(bz("OUTPUT4"), "/KEY4/KEY2/KEY1", [][]byte{bz("INPUT1")})
assert.NotNil(t, err)

// Test OP Verifier 1
popz = []ProofOperator{op1, op2, op3, op4}
err = popz.VerifyValue(bz("OUTPUT4"), "/KEY4/KEY2/KEY1", bz("INPUT1"), func(operator ProofOperator) error {
return nil
})
assert.Nil(t, err)

err = popz.VerifyValue(bz("OUTPUT4"), "/KEY4/KEY2/KEY1", bz("INPUT1"), func(operator ProofOperator) error {
return fmt.Errorf("suspend")
})
assert.EqualError(t, err, "suspend")

}

func bz(s string) []byte {
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 6fa739f

Please sign in to comment.