Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update validator to check for cache only for specific TEST_SUIT_ID #70

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

EdwinPhilip
Copy link

@EdwinPhilip EdwinPhilip commented Mar 11, 2024

When trying to use cache from previous builds and if even one of previous TEST_SUITES fails or aborted, the upload cache is skipped, which means during the download cache in the next run, the valid function will return false and hence no cache will be used for the previously passed test suites. This just keeps going until all the test suites pass without getting aborted or failed.

The modification in this PR proposes to check cached files count only for the particular test suit id based on USE_TEST_SUITE_ID_CACHE env. This should greatly improve total tests run time in CI environments when concurrent builds are disabled (cases when new run starts, previous build gets aborted)


Before submitting the PR make sure the following are checked:

  • Wrote good commit messages.
  • Feature branch is up-to-date with the main branch.
  • Squashed related commits together.
  • Added tests.
  • Run bundle exec rake.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Enhanced performance by improving validation logic in the testing framework.
    • Added a new instance variable to control validation behavior in the Validator and AwsError classes.
    • Updated the valid? method in the Validator class to delegate based on the new instance variable.
    • Adjusted the cache_files_list method in the AwsError class to dynamically construct the prefix based on the new instance variable and environment settings.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update introduces a significant enhancement to the validation process in the Validator class and the AwsError class. It introduces a new instance variable, @use_test_suite_id_cache, that influences validation behavior. This change enables more flexible and optimized validation strategies based on the project's needs.

Changes

File Change Summary
.../remote_cache/validator.rb, .../aws.rb Added @use_test_suite_id_cache for control over validation behavior. Updated methods to utilize it.

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where tests and checks reside,
A rabbit hopped in, with a leap so wide.
"Behold," it said, "a change so bright,
Validation now swift, like a star in the night.
With a toggle so clever, it chooses its path,
Ensuring your code faces no wrath."
🌟📜

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Mar 11, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 568c5e7 and 868b6d9.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lib/rspec_tracer/remote_cache/validator.rb (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
lib/rspec_tracer/remote_cache/validator.rb (6)
  • 11-11: Introduced a new instance variable @use_test_suite_id_cache to control the validation behavior based on the presence of this environment variable. This change is crucial for implementing the feature described in the PR objectives. Ensure that the environment variable USE_TEST_SUITE_ID_CACHE is documented, including its expected values and effects on the validation process.
  • 16-16: Raising a ValidationError if either TEST_SUITE_ID or TEST_SUITES is not set but not both. This is a good practice for ensuring that the necessary environment variables are provided. However, consider improving the error message to be more informative about the expected conditions and how to resolve the issue.
  • 24-28: The valid? method now delegates to either general_validation or test_suite_id_specific_validation based on the value of @use_test_suite_id_cache. This is a key change that aligns with the PR objectives. Ensure that this logic is thoroughly tested, especially the conditional branching based on the environment variable.
  • 38-38: The regex pattern for cached files has been updated. Ensure that this pattern correctly matches the expected file paths in the cache. It might be beneficial to add unit tests specifically for validating these regex patterns against a variety of expected and unexpected file paths.
  • 50-58: The general_validation method appears to correctly implement the existing broad validation process. However, consider adding inline comments explaining the logic behind the specific counts and regex patterns used, as this will improve maintainability and understandability of the code.
  • 60-71: The test_suite_id_specific_validation method introduces targeted validation logic for specific test suite IDs. This method's implementation is crucial for the feature's effectiveness. Ensure that the dynamic adjustment of regex patterns for specific test suite IDs is accurate and that edge cases are considered. Adding detailed unit tests for this method would be highly beneficial.

@EdwinPhilip
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 868b6d9 and f1eb6aa.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lib/rspec_tracer/remote_cache/aws.rb (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
lib/rspec_tracer/remote_cache/aws.rb (1)
  • 11-12: The introduction of @use_test_suite_id_cache and @test_suite_id based on environment variables is a straightforward and effective way to enable conditional logic for cache file handling. This approach aligns with the PR's objective to optimize cache utilization by allowing targeted validation of cache files. However, it's crucial to ensure that the environment variables USE_TEST_SUITE_ID_CACHE and TEST_SUITE_ID are documented and validated appropriately to avoid potential misconfigurations.

Ensure that the environment variables USE_TEST_SUITE_ID_CACHE and TEST_SUITE_ID are well-documented and validated to prevent misconfigurations.

Comment on lines 65 to 69
if @use_test_suite_id_cache && !@test_suite_id.nil?
prefix = "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/#{@test_suite_id}/"
else
prefix = "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/"
end
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The modification to the cache_files_list method to dynamically construct the prefix based on the presence of @use_test_suite_id_cache and @test_suite_id is a logical extension of the introduced instance variables. This change supports the PR's goal of enhancing cache utilization efficiency by enabling targeted cache validation. However, it's important to consider the security implications of dynamically constructing paths for AWS S3 operations.

The use of dynamic paths in AWS S3 operations, as seen in the cache_files_list method, raises concerns about potential code injection vulnerabilities. The static analysis hints suggest auditing the input to system calls to prevent code injection vulnerabilities. It's advisable to sanitize or validate any user-supplied input that could influence the constructed paths or commands.

- `#{@aws_cli} s3 ls #{prefix} --recursive`.chomp.split("\n")
+ sanitized_prefix = sanitize_prefix(prefix)
+ `#{@aws_cli} s3 ls #{sanitized_prefix} --recursive`.chomp.split("\n")

Consider implementing a method sanitize_prefix that ensures the prefix variable does not contain any malicious content before it's used in the system call.


Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if @use_test_suite_id_cache && !@test_suite_id.nil?
prefix = "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/#{@test_suite_id}/"
else
prefix = "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/"
end
if @use_test_suite_id_cache && !@test_suite_id.nil?
prefix = "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/#{@test_suite_id}/"
else
prefix = "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/"
end
+ sanitized_prefix = sanitize_prefix(prefix)
+ `#{@aws_cli} s3 ls #{sanitized_prefix} --recursive`.chomp.split("\n")

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f1eb6aa and 1a03fcd.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lib/rspec_tracer/remote_cache/aws.rb (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
lib/rspec_tracer/remote_cache/aws.rb (1)
  • 11-12: The introduction of @use_test_suite_id_cache and @test_suite_id based on environment variables aligns with the PR's objectives. Ensure that TEST_SUITE_ID is validated or sanitized elsewhere in the code to prevent potential security issues.

@@ -60,7 +62,7 @@ def upload_branch_refs(branch_name, file_name)
end

def cache_files_list(ref)
prefix = "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/"
prefix = @use_test_suite_id_cache && !@test_suite_id.nil? ? "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/#{@test_suite_id}/" : "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The dynamic construction of the prefix for cache file listing is a key part of the proposed enhancement. However, executing shell commands with interpolated variables (#{@aws_cli} s3 ls #{prefix} --recursive) poses a security risk if the variables are not properly sanitized. Consider using Ruby's Open3 library to execute shell commands, which provides more control and helps prevent code injection vulnerabilities.

- `#{@aws_cli} s3 ls #{prefix} --recursive`.chomp.split("\n")
+ require 'open3'
+ stdout, stderr, status = Open3.capture3("#{@aws_cli} s3 ls #{prefix} --recursive")
+ raise AwsError, stderr unless status.success?
+ stdout.chomp.split("\n")

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
prefix = @use_test_suite_id_cache && !@test_suite_id.nil? ? "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/#{@test_suite_id}/" : "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/"
prefix = @use_test_suite_id_cache && !@test_suite_id.nil? ? "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/#{@test_suite_id}/" : "s3://#{@s3_bucket}/#{@s3_path}/#{ref}/"

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1a03fcd and 1bc105b.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lib/rspec_tracer/remote_cache/validator.rb (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lib/rspec_tracer/remote_cache/validator.rb

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant