Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove low quality repo #2726

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

yinggaozhen
Copy link
Contributor

@yinggaozhen yinggaozhen commented Sep 20, 2019

repo update reason
https://github.com/jimrobinson/kvbench 2014-04-20 TODO
https://github.com/diankong/GoDocTooltip 2016-01-30 TODO
https://github.com/codemodus/catena 2018-08-26 TODO
https://github.com/beyang/hgo 2015-08-25 TODO
https://github.com/poorny/translate 2016-02-28 TODO
https://github.com/dietsche/textbelt 2015-09-04 TODO
https://github.com/Omie/rrdaclient 2014-09-20 TODO
https://github.com/chonthu/go-google-analytics 2015-06-09 TODO
https://github.com/Aorioli/gcm 2015-12-04 TODO
https://github.com/zach-klippenstein/goregen 2016-03-04 TODO
https://github.com/endeveit/enca 2016-03-15 TODO
https://github.com/hscells/doi 2017-08-21 TODO
https://github.com/tv42/mockhttp 2014-10-30 TODO
https://github.com/rdrdr/hamcrest 2011-02-15 TODO
https://github.com/ThePaw/go-gt 2015-09-14 TODO
https://github.com/aybabtme/portproxy 2014-12-13 TODO
https://github.com/a2800276/porter 2013-10-03 TODO
https://github.com/rookii/paicehusk 2013-12-16 TODO
https://github.com/goodsign/libtextcat 2012-12-28 TODO
https://github.com/rjohnsondev/golibstemmer 2014-06-18 TODO
https://github.com/zhulik/go_mediainfo 2015-12-25 TODO
https://github.com/mengzhuo/cookiestxt 2017-10-09 TODO
https://github.com/TreyBastian/colourize 2016-05-10 TODO
https://github.com/ian-kent/envconf 2014-10-26 TODO
https://github.com/ian-kent/purl 2014-12-08 TODO
https://github.com/robfig/bind 2014-08-17 TODO
https://github.com/GlenKelley/go-collada 2013-09-27 TODO
https://github.com/jyotiska/go-webcolors 2015-08-21 TODO
https://github.com/ftrvxmtrx/tga 2015-05-24 TODO
https://github.com/sanbornm/mp 2016-05-12 TODO
https://github.com/alexcesaro/log 2015-09-16 TODO
https://github.com/e-dard/godist 2015-05-11 TODO
https://github.com/ThePaw/probab 2015-09-14 TODO
https://github.com/ian-kent/goose 2014-12-21 TODO
https://github.com/go-xkg/xkg 2015-01-08 TODO

Copy link
Collaborator

@ceriath ceriath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you assume low stars = low quality? If thats the case, the starcount does not really tell us anything about the quality of the repository. If you have an actual reason why any of these repos is bad quality, please add the reason

@uded
Copy link

uded commented Sep 20, 2019

As I do not agree with stars rating being the only measurement of quality, it would be awesome if on awesome-go.com that information (to be specific: stars and last update) could be included. I am avoiding repositories that have 2-3 years since the last update, and the number of stars is an excellent way to determine at which libraries in the given category I am going to look at first...

I am certain this information would be easy to add while generating the website itself. Happy to do it myself if no one will opt-in.

@ceriath
Copy link
Collaborator

ceriath commented Sep 20, 2019

@uded you might want to have a look into #1931

@uded
Copy link

uded commented Sep 21, 2019

@ceriath thanks for the info, I missed that one

@kirillDanshin
Copy link
Contributor

@ceriath I'd ignore the github stars column and look into last update date while reviewing each library from that list, actually

@ceriath
Copy link
Collaborator

ceriath commented Sep 21, 2019

@kirillDanshin I'd agree on that, i was just wondering if @yinggaozhen had any other criteria.
Just keep in mind, just because there are no updates, it doesn't necessarily mean it's bad, since it could be stable

@yinggaozhen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ceriath @kirillDanshin
I opened a new PR and added the reason for deletion, I hope you can help review it again.
New Pull Request : #2734

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants