Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ZOOKEEPER- 4793: Check the server status when execute ruok command #2113

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

ZOOKEEPER- 4793: Check the server status when execute ruok command #2113

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+5 −1

Conversation

horizonzy
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@horizonzy horizonzy closed this Jan 25, 2024
@horizonzy horizonzy reopened this Jan 25, 2024
@horizonzy horizonzy closed this Jan 25, 2024
@horizonzy horizonzy reopened this Jan 25, 2024
eolivelli
eolivelli requested changes Jan 25, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@eolivelli eolivelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello,
I am not sure we want to introduce this breaking change and also the four letters api is kind of obsolete

isn't there any other way you can get this information ? using the new http API ?

@horizonzy
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, that makes sense.

Hello, I am not sure we want to introduce this breaking change and also the four letters api is kind of obsolete

If so, I think we would better add a command stateCommand to get the server state.

isn't there any other way you can get this information ? using the new http API ?

Does the zookeeper expose restful API? I don't see it. Could you please link it here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@eolivelli eolivelli eolivelli requested changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@horizonzy @eolivelli