-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-46679][SQL] Fix for SparkUnsupportedOperationException Not found an encoder of the type T, when using Parameterized class #48304
Open
ahshahid
wants to merge
8
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
ahshahid:SPARK-46679
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bf68efb
SPARK-46679 Fix for org.apache.spark.SparkUnsupportedOperationExcepti…
71ceb45
Merge branch 'master' into SPARK-46679
6f0071d
SPARK-46679 adding code which got missed in previous checkin
1b46c22
SPARK-46679 adding code which got missed in previous checkin
8cbc817
SPARK-46679 refactored code
a063f6c
SPARK-46679 added a property in bean to explicitly test nesting of sa…
9209722
SPARK-46679. implemented feedback to reduce test classes clutter
622089f
Merge branch 'master' into SPARK-46679
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I spent a bit of time playing around with the test bean classes, and I think the actual minimal example to reproduce the bug is
while I know this test case came from the user's report, I think it would actually be easier for another developer to understand the point of this test case with the more minimal example.
I do think there is value in having the test cases with both combos of names for the type parameters still.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oops, sorry ignore this, I made a mistake posting my comments to github earlier. I meant to post this, but I think the simplification done already is fine