-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 404
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OAK-10341 Tree store #1577
OAK-10341 Tree store #1577
Conversation
...n-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/index/indexer/document/tree/TreeStore.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...n-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/index/indexer/document/tree/TreeStore.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Updated dependencies.
…Supplier implementation (#1580)
…dencies reference vulnerable amazon ion-java version) (#1581)
* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-upgrade) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-store-spi) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-it) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-store-document) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-store-composite) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-segment-tar) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-segment-azure) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-security-spi) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-security-search) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-run-commons) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-run) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-lucene) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-jcr) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-exercise) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-core-spi) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-core) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-commons) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-blob-plugins) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-blob-cloud, oak-blob-cloud-azure) * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-upgrade) - cleanup * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-store-spi) - cleanup * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-store-document) - cleanup * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-store-composite) - cleanup * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-segment-tar) - cleanup * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-lucene) - cleanup * OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-jcr) - cleanup
...because of failures, as in https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/actions/runs/10021673018
- "oak.indexer.persistedLinkedList.cacheSize" - sets the cache size of the PersistedLinkedList used to traverse the FFS. This controls the number FFS entries kept in memory.
Co-authored-by: pirlogea <[email protected]>
…other: PathUtils.isDirectAncestor() (#1598)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have only looked at the parts that interact with existing code, did not review the TreeStore or IndexStore logic.
...src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/index/indexer/document/DocumentStoreIndexerBase.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/index/indexer/document/flatfile/FlatFileNodeStoreBuilder.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/index/indexer/document/flatfile/FlatFileNodeStoreBuilder.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../apache/jackrabbit/oak/index/indexer/document/flatfile/pipelined/PipelinedTransformTask.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Just my opinion, but I see no comments that address the logic or readability of the TreeStore. Wouldn't it have made sense to have some reviews on that before merging? |
Just documenting the tree store (alone) wont resolve that problem. I think we are missing high-level documentation of the implementation for many many features. Including the blob store, the segment store, the document store, oak-core, oak-jcr, etc. I think we should discuss what implementation level-documentation is needed in general. I view that as an independent problem. |
Ready for review.