Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OAK-10341 Tree store #1577

Merged
merged 94 commits into from
Sep 6, 2024
Merged

OAK-10341 Tree store #1577

merged 94 commits into from
Sep 6, 2024

Conversation

thomasmueller
Copy link
Member

@thomasmueller thomasmueller commented Jul 11, 2024

Ready for review.

thomasmueller and others added 25 commits July 12, 2024 11:26
…dencies reference vulnerable amazon ion-java version) (#1581)
* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-upgrade)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-store-spi)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-it)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-store-document)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-store-composite)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-segment-tar)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-segment-azure)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-security-spi)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-security-search)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-run-commons)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-run)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-lucene)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-jcr)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-exercise)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-core-spi)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-core)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-commons)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-blob-plugins)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-blob-cloud, oak-blob-cloud-azure)

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-upgrade) - cleanup

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-store-spi) - cleanup

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-store-document) - cleanup

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-store-composite) - cleanup

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-segment-tar) - cleanup

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-lucene) - cleanup

* OAK-10945: Remove usage of Guava Function interface (oak-jcr) - cleanup
- "oak.indexer.persistedLinkedList.cacheSize" - sets the cache size of the PersistedLinkedList used to traverse the FFS. This controls the number FFS entries kept in memory.
@thomasmueller thomasmueller marked this pull request as ready for review August 29, 2024 13:22
Copy link
Contributor

@nfsantos nfsantos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have only looked at the parts that interact with existing code, did not review the TreeStore or IndexStore logic.

@thomasmueller thomasmueller merged commit bb4ecd1 into trunk Sep 6, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@steffenvan
Copy link
Contributor

steffenvan commented Sep 6, 2024

Just my opinion, but I see no comments that address the logic or readability of the TreeStore. Wouldn't it have made sense to have some reviews on that before merging?

@thomasmueller
Copy link
Member Author

I see no comments that address the logic or readability of the TreeStore

Just documenting the tree store (alone) wont resolve that problem. I think we are missing high-level documentation of the implementation for many many features. Including the blob store, the segment store, the document store, oak-core, oak-jcr, etc. I think we should discuss what implementation level-documentation is needed in general. I view that as an independent problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
10 participants