Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-36769] support fury serializer for pyflink #25672

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: release-1.16
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kaori-seasons
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change

Hi, community. Currently, in the batch verification scenario of our algorithm data, we use pyflink and encounter low transmission efficiency caused by low performance of pickle4-based encoding. After research, we decided to adopt Apache fury, a serialization framework based on pickle5 encoding. The implementation of fury in python will define the transmission buffer size in the protocol for transmission to improve the performance of large data transmission.

Related communications with fury community members can be found here

Brief change log

(for example:)

  • The TaskInfo is stored in the blob store on job creation time as a persistent artifact
  • Deployments RPC transmits only the blob storage reference
  • TaskManagers retrieve the TaskInfo from the blob cache

Verifying this change

Please make sure both new and modified tests in this PR follow the conventions for tests defined in our code quality guide.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (100MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after master (JobManager) failure
  • Added test that validates that TaskInfo is transferred only once across recoveries
  • Manually verified the change by running a 4 node cluster with 2 JobManagers and 4 TaskManagers, a stateful streaming program, and killing one JobManager and two TaskManagers during the execution, verifying that recovery happens correctly.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (yes / no)
  • The serializers: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

@kaori-seasons kaori-seasons changed the title [ISSUE#36769] support fury serializer for pyflink [FLINK-36769] support fury serializer for pyflink Nov 21, 2024
@kaori-seasons kaori-seasons marked this pull request as draft November 21, 2024 13:48
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Nov 21, 2024

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@kaori-seasons
Copy link
Contributor Author

@flinkbot run azure

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants