Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement algorithm to compute the standalone Coriolis matrix C(q, ν) #41

Open
diegoferigo opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #75
Open

Implement algorithm to compute the standalone Coriolis matrix C(q, ν) #41

diegoferigo opened this issue Jun 30, 2023 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #75
Assignees
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@diegoferigo
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@traversaro
Copy link
Contributor

A possible algorithm to implement is https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.01033 .

@diegoferigo
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks! I already had a look at it. Another interesting xref is robotology/idyntree#745.

@flferretti
Copy link
Collaborator

Check out: flferretti/jaxsim @ feature/coriolis

@diegoferigo
Copy link
Member Author

diegoferigo commented Jun 10, 2024

Now that #169 added the support of computing $\dot{J}$, I tried to compute the Coriolis matrix without implementing a new RBDA (I still have few doubts on how to handle the base-related blocks for an iterative algorithm) in #172. The computation is pretty slow, but downstream users that need this matrix for particular controllers at least can play with it.

I'll leave this issue open since an iterative algorithm is desired. Maybe someone, now that there is a ground truth, is willing enough to dig into this implementation sooner or later.

@diegoferigo diegoferigo added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jun 10, 2024
@flferretti flferretti self-assigned this Sep 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants