Skip to content

Scripts needed to replicate methodology used in "A Quantitative View of the Structure of Institutional Scientific Collaborations Using the Example of Berlin" to appear in Quantitative Science Studies.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

akbaritabar/QSS-2021-replication-of-methodology

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

10 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

QSS-2021-replication-of-methodology

Scripts needed to replicate the methodology used in "A Quantitative View of the Structure of Institutional Scientific Collaborations Using the Example of Berlin" to appear in Quantitative Science Studies.

Link to paper: https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/doi/10.1162/qss_a_00131/100515/

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00131

Cite as

Aliakbar Akbaritabar. (2021, April 1). Scripts needed to replicate methodology used in "A Quantitative View of the Structure of Institutional Scientific Collaborations Using the Example of Berlin" published in Quantitative Science Studies. (Version 1.0). Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4657326

Preprint

You can read a preprint of the manuscript here:

Berlin: A Quantitative View of the Structure of Institutional Scientific Collaborations Aliakbar Akbaritabar Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.08355

Abstract

This paper examines the structure of scientific collaborations in a large European metropolitan area. It aims to identify strategic coalitions among organizations in Berlin as a specific case with high institutional and sectoral diversity. By adopting a global, regional and organization based approach we provide a quantitative, exploratory and macro view of this diversity. We use publications data with at least one organization located in Berlin from 1996-2017. We further investigate four members of the Berlin University Alliance (BUA) through their self-represented research profiles comparing it with empirical results of OECD disciplines. Using a bipartite network modeling framework, we are able to move beyond the uncontested trend towards team science and increasing internationalization. Our results show that BUA members shape the structure of scientific collaborations in the region. However, they are not collaborating cohesively in all disciplines. Larger divides exist in some disciplines e.g., Agricultural Sciences and Humanities. Only Medical and Health Sciences have cohesive intraregional collaborations which signals the success of regional cooperation established in 2003. We explain possible underlying factors shaping the observed trends and sectoral and intra-regional groupings. A major methodological contribution of this paper is evaluating coverage and accuracy of different organization name disambiguation techniques.

Description of scripts

Inside the code folder, there are six Python 3 scripts. Three are presenting the organization name disambiguation techniques as presented in the figure 1 of the manuscript (and preprint linked above) which are OrgNameStringMatching.py, OrgNameFuzzyMatching.py and MatchingRORAPI.py. BipartiteCommunityDetectionDo.py is the main module where bipartite networks are constructed and community detection happens (further detail to be found in manuscript). This module imports and uses two modules (functions), one builds the networks (BuildNetworkTables.py) and one is a helper function for bipartite community detection (BipartiteCommunityDetectionHelper.py).

About

Scripts needed to replicate methodology used in "A Quantitative View of the Structure of Institutional Scientific Collaborations Using the Example of Berlin" to appear in Quantitative Science Studies.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published

Languages