Skip to content

WireMock Controlled Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability through URL

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Sep 6, 2023 in wiremock/wiremock • Updated Nov 6, 2023

Package

maven org.wiremock:wiremock-webhooks-extension (Maven)

Affected versions

>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.3
>= 2.0.0, < 2.35.1

Patched versions

3.0.3
2.35.1

Description

Impact

WireMock can be configured to only permit proxying (and therefore recording) to certain addresses. This is achieved via a list of allowed address rules and a list of denied address rules, where the allowed list is evaluated first. Documentation.

Until WireMock Webhooks Extension 3.0.0-beta-15, the filtering of target addresses from the proxy mode DID NOT work for Webhooks, so the users were potentially vulnerable regardless of the limitProxyTargets settings.

Via the WireMock webhooks configuration, POST requests from a webhook might be forwarded to an arbitrary service reachable from WireMock’s instance. For example, If someone is running the WireMock docker Container inside a private cluster, they can trigger internal POST requests against unsecured APIs or even against secure ones by passing a token, discovered using another exploit, via authentication headers.

Affected components

  • WireMock Webhooks Extension 2.x versions until 2.35.1 (security patch)
  • WireMock 3.x version until 3.0.3 (security patch)
  • All versions of WireMock Studio (discontinued). This distribution bundles the WireMock Webhooks Extension and activates it by default

Patches and Mitigation

NOTE: It was confirmed that WireMock Cloud does not expose sensitive internal APIs and hence not vulnerable to the issue. No action is needed if you use this SaaS distribution.

Workarounds

  • Use external firewall rules to define the list of permitted destinations

References

Credits

  • @W0rty for reporting CVE-2023-39967 in WireMock Studio
  • WireMock Inc. team for discovering similar exploits in Webhooks and the risk in the Proxy mode defaults for WireMock

References

@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev published to wiremock/wiremock Sep 6, 2023
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 6, 2023
Reviewed Sep 6, 2023
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Sep 6, 2023
Last updated Nov 6, 2023

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

EPSS score

0.072%
(32nd percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2023-41327

GHSA ID

GHSA-hq8w-9w8w-pmx7

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.