Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MWPW-155984 - Brick list showing null value in link label #2921

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: stage
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

@ryanmparrish ryanmparrish added the needs-verification PR requires E2E testing by a reviewer label Sep 19, 2024
@ryanmparrish ryanmparrish requested a review from a team September 19, 2024 17:46
@ryanmparrish ryanmparrish requested a review from a team as a code owner September 19, 2024 17:46
Copy link
Contributor

aem-code-sync bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Hello, I'm the AEM Code Sync Bot and I will run some actions to deploy your branch and validate page speed.
In case there are problems, just click a checkbox below to rerun the respective action.

  • Re-run PSI checks
  • Re-sync branch
Commits

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.24%. Comparing base (adf2a9c) to head (66d094b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on stage.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
libs/utils/decorate.js 40.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            stage    #2921   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.23%   96.24%           
=======================================
  Files         236      236           
  Lines       54254    54257    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits        52212    52217    +5     
+ Misses       2042     2040    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@JasonHowellSlavin JasonHowellSlavin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Does feel like a unit test should have caught this.

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is not passing all required checks. Please see this discussion for information on how to get all checks passing. Inconsistent checks can be manually retried. If a test absolutely can not pass for a good reason, please add a comment with an explanation to the PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-verification PR requires E2E testing by a reviewer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants