Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exception caught Cannot open file XXX/.bin_reads/paired_0.off': iostream error #1250

Open
1 task done
gorfol opened this issue Feb 27, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
1 task done
Labels
io Input / output (e.g. due to disk storage) errors

Comments

@gorfol
Copy link

gorfol commented Feb 27, 2024

Description of bug

Hi,
Our server has 512 GB of RAM and 256 cores. I have an issue shown in the spades.log. If I run spades with root privileges, the results are the same. There is a paired_0.off file in the .bin_reads directory. We had an SSD change before this error happened, but the Linux and SPAdes version (however compiled again on the new system), the fastq files and parameters are the same.
Thank you!

spades.log

spades.log

params.txt

params.txt

SPAdes version

3.15.5

Operating System

Ubuntu 22.04.1

Python Version

Python 3.11.5

Method of SPAdes installation

manual

No errors reported in spades.log

  • Yes
@asl
Copy link
Member

asl commented Feb 28, 2024

Hello

There is an I/O problem. SPAdes was unable to read one of its intermediate files. So, maybe more information is available in the system log? Does moving output / scratch dir to other volume helps?

@asl asl added the io Input / output (e.g. due to disk storage) errors label Feb 28, 2024
@gorfol
Copy link
Author

gorfol commented Mar 1, 2024

Thank you! Unfortunately I cannot find anything in the syslog and moving the whole spades directory to a mounted NAS drive does not solve the problem. I see the intermediate file and can access by my user, so I do not know why spades cannot handle it.

@asl
Copy link
Member

asl commented Mar 1, 2024

Does it reproduce with another dataset? How about running spades.py --test?

@gorfol
Copy link
Author

gorfol commented Mar 1, 2024

Yes, I tried different datasets.

The test ran with this result:
== Running: /home/gorfol/miniconda3/bin/python /home/gorfol/spades-3.15.5/assembler/src/spades_pipeline/scripts/check_test_script.py --mode common --result_contigs_filename /home/gorfol/spades-3.15.5/assembler/spades_test/contigs.fasta --result_scaffolds_filename /home/gorfol/spades-3.15.5/assembler/spades_test/scaffolds.fasta

========= TEST PASSED CORRECTLY.
.
.
.
======= SPAdes pipeline finished WITH WARNINGS!

=== Error correction and assembling warnings:

  • 0:00:00.957 1M / 280M WARN General (launcher.cpp : 178) Your data seems to have high uniform coverage depth. It is strongly recommended to use --isolate option.
    ======= Warnings saved to /home/gorfol/spades-3.15.5/assembler/spades_test/warnings.log

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
io Input / output (e.g. due to disk storage) errors
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants