change line 139 of cpp/gpp_python_common.cpp #449
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…e_consistency_check_between_gpu_vs_cpu_computation_for_general_qp_EI
…eck_between_gpu_vs_cpu_computation_for_general_qp_EI Jialei gh219 improve consistency check between gpu vs cpu computation for general qp ei
…nning_arm_names out to superclass Epsilon.
…_create_epsilon_first_bandit_endpoint
…_up_gpu_computation_on_EI_gradEI Conflicts: moe/optimal_learning/cpp/gpu/gpp_cuda_math.cu
…ndit_endpoint Implement Epsilon-First bandit endpoint
adding missing backticks to fix rendering issue
Fix kwarg passing in combined example
…c kwargs aren't set 2. adding kwargs to mean_var in moe_examples
…ct_cudaEI_to_optimization_algorithm Conflicts: moe/optimal_learning/cpp/gpp_core.cpp moe/optimal_learning/cpp/gpp_expected_improvement_gpu.cpp moe/optimal_learning/cpp/gpp_expected_improvement_gpu.hpp moe/optimal_learning/cpp/gpp_expected_improvement_gpu_test.cpp
…ombined_example Eliu gh 358 fix kwarg handling in combined example
…_up_gpu_computation_on_EI_gradEI
…github.com:sc932/MOE into jialei_gh270_connect_cudaEI_to_optimization_algorithm
2. make autodoc tools understand the gpu directory 3. cleanup some doc warnings & rendering issues
added COBYLA (no REST interface yet)
C++ GradientDescentParameters now tracks num_steps_averaged (but doesnt use it)
…members_to_python optimizer param struct improvements
Conda Installer recipe
filling out conda todo
pre-tagging version bumping
bump changelog for v0.2.2
…calculation Fixing UCB1 and UCB1-tuned algorithm calculation of upper confidence bound
Updated youtube links
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/command/include_directories.html so gcc 4.8+ will stop warning about things in Python headers
|
I'm somewhat confused as to why there's 250+ changes over 291 files :O master way out of date or something? Git doing something dumb? For just 1 line I'll update it, don't worry about this anymore :) |
|
It's probably something I did incorrectly; that was my first PR. Probably should have just let you do it :) |
Mw/pip fixed
Something appears to be broken in our travis workflow. The last major MOE commit built successfully and tests still pass locally. But from the passage of time, the travis blob has been disabled. The travis stuff needs updating anyway (numpy, scipy from wheels, not manual rebuild, yuck).
Temporarily disable Travis build widget.
screwed up the indents
…ll_docs Suntzu86 gh 401 better docker install docs
Update Scott's email to a working address.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
change line 139 of cpp/gpp_python_common.cpp to:
See #440