Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug Fix: Integer overflow on windows in Project Euler 072 #10672

Closed

Conversation

ManpreetXSingh
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your change:

  • Bug Fix in Sol1.py

    • I've identified a bug in sol1.py that appears to be related to integer overflow. This issue specifically arises on Windows platforms because, by default, numpy on Windows 64-bit uses 32-bit integers, whereas on Linux, it employs 64-bit integers, so it also went unnoticed in automated checking.
  • Sol2.py

    • Separated prime number generator from solution.
  • Checked all Euler Problems

    • I've checked all other project euler solutions using the following command on both windows and linux.
      • pytest scripts\validate_solutions.py
  • Both solutions have a runtime of less than or equal to 1 sec. So, I've not tried to optimize anything yet. Let me know if required.
  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • [ x This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the description above includes the issue number(s) with a closing keyword: "Fixes #ISSUE-NUMBER".

@algorithms-keeper
Copy link

Multiple Pull Request Detected

@manpreetsingh2004, we are extremely excited that you want to submit multiple algorithms in this repository but we have a limit on how many pull request a user can keep open at a time. This is to make sure all maintainers and users focus on a limited number of pull requests at a time to maintain the quality of the code.

This pull request is being closed as the user already has an open pull request. Please focus on your previous pull request before opening another one. Thank you for your cooperation.

User opened pull requests (including this one): #10672, #10615, #10580, #10558

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 18, 2023
@quant12345
Copy link
Contributor

@manpreetsingh2004 what numbers are different, show an example?

@ManpreetXSingh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@quant12345
On windows it produces a negative number -979125625 without specifying dtype=np.int64. With dtype=np.int64, it produces the correct output 303963552391.
It is a known issue with numpy.
References:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants